Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
166 3 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-09-13 15:31 |
SM ISO690:2012 BACA, Svetlana, MALAESTEAN, Yurii, KEENE, Tony D., ADAMS, Harry, WARD, Michael D., HAUSER, J, NEELS, Antonia, DECURTINS, Silvio. One-dimensional manganese coordination polymers composed of polynuclear cluster blocks and polypyridyl linkers: Structures and properties. In: Inorganic Chemistry, 2008, vol. 47, pp. 11108-11119. ISSN 0020-1669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ic8014145 |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Inorganic Chemistry | |
Volumul 47 / 2008 / ISSN 0020-1669 | |
|
|
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/ic8014145 | |
Pag. 11108-11119 | |
Descarcă PDF | |
Rezumat | |
The synthesis, crystal structures and magnetic properties of five new manganese compounds are reported. These include a linear trinuclear cluster [Mn(II)3(O2CCHMe2)6(dpa) 2]·2MeCN (1) (dpa = 2,2′-dipyridylamine), a tetranuclear cluster [Mn(II)2Mn(III)2O2(O 2CCMe3)6(bpy)2] (3) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine), and chain coordination polymers composed of cluster blocks such as Mn3, Mn3O, and Mn4O2 bridged by 2,2′-bipyrimidine (bpm) or hexamethylentetramine (hmta) ligands to give ([Mn(II)3(O2CCHMe2) 6(bpm)]·2EtOH)n (2), [Mn(II)2Mn(III) 2O2(O2CCHMe2)6(bpm)(EtOH) 4]n (4), and (([Mn(II)Mn(III)2O(O 2CCHMe2)6(hmta)2]·EtOH) n (5). The magnetic analysis of the compounds was achieved using a combination of vector coupling and full-matrix diagonalization methods. Susceptibility data for compound 1 was fitted using a vector coupling model to give g = 2.02(1) and 2J/kB = -5.38(2) K. To model the trimer chain, we used vector coupling for initial values of J1 and then diagonalization techniques to estimate J2 to give g = 1.98(1), 2J1/kB = -3.3(1) K and 2J2/kB = -1.0(1) K by approximating the system to a dimer of trimers. The analysis of 3 was made difficult by the mixture of polymorphs and the difficulties of a three-J model, while for 4 an analysis was not possible because of the size of the computation and the relative magnitudes of the three couplings. Compound 5 was modeled using the same techniques as 2 to give g = 1.99(1), 2J 1/kB = +32.5(2) K, 2J2/kB = -16.8(1) K, and 2J3/kB = +0.4(1) K. The combination of techniques has worked we |
|
|