Quality of hospital care for children in Kazakhstan, Republic of Moldova, and Russia: Systematic observational assessment
Close
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
162 0
SM ISO690:2012
DUKE, Trevor D., KESHISHIYAN, Elena, KUTTUMURATOVA, Aigul, OSTERGREN, Mikael, RYUMINA, Irina, STASII, Ekaterina, WEBER, Martin W., TAMBURLINI, Giorgio. Quality of hospital care for children in Kazakhstan, Republic of Moldova, and Russia: Systematic observational assessment. In: The Lancet, 2006, vol. 367, pp. 919-925. ISSN 0140-6736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68382-7
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
The Lancet
Volumul 367 / 2006 / ISSN 0140-6736

Quality of hospital care for children in Kazakhstan, Republic of Moldova, and Russia: Systematic observational assessment

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68382-7

Pag. 919-925

Duke Trevor D.1, Keshishiyan Elena2, Kuttumuratova Aigul3, Ostergren Mikael4, Ryumina Irina5, Stasii Ekaterina6, Weber Martin W.7, Tamburlini Giorgio8
 
1 University of Melbourne,
2 Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University,
3 WHO European Centre for Primary Health Care, Almaty, Kazakhstan,
4 WHO Regional Office for Europe,
5 WHO Country Office, Russian Federation,
6 ”Nicolae Testemițanu” State University of Medicine and Pharmacy,
7 World Health Organisation,
8 Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 14 iunie 2023


Rezumat

Background: Major concerns about the quality of basic hospital care for children have been raised in developing countries, but no formal assessment applying international standards has been done in the Commonwealth of Independent States. Methods: We assessed 17 hospitals in Kazakhstan, the Republic of Moldova, and the Russian Federation with a generic WHO hospital assessment framework adapted for use in the WHO European region. WHO management guidelines for paediatric care in peripheral hospitals were used as standards. Findings: Hospital access for children was generally good. Good health networks existed, and skilled and committed doctors cared for children. Case-fatality rates were low. However, unnecessary and lengthy hospital stays were common, and most children received excessive and ineffective treatment (in one country median number of drugs prescribed concurrently was 5, IQR 2-6). Several conditions were systematically overdiagnosed, especially neurological disease, or overinvestigated, such as acute diarrhoea. Reasons for these practices included absence of clear evidence-based clinical guidelines, regulations tying duration of admission to financial reimbursement, generalisation of disease-control methods from rare problems to common illnesses, and regulations maintaining financial and professional status of some subspecialties. Many disincentives to efficient practice existed. Interpretation: To improve quality of hospital care for children in the Commonwealth of Independent States, several issues must be addressed, including: adoption of international guidelines for inpatient management; complementary guidelines for outpatient management; reforms to health regulations governing admission and discharge criteria; improvement of quality of training, availability of medical information, and systems to promote and certify quality of care.

Cuvinte-cheie
EMTREE medical terms acute diarrhea, article, child, child health, childhood mortality, Clinical practice, community assessment, controlled study, disease duration, evidence based medicine, financial management, health care access, health care quality, hospital care, human, Infection control, length of stay, major clinical study, medical assessment, medical specialist, neurologic disease, physician attitude, practice guideline, prescription, priority journal, professionalism, rare disease, reimbursement, World Health Organization