The challenges in contemporary society influenced by the ei openings break the borders on all the levels of the hierarchy intra and extra societal, but also enviorement. Such burglaries shall favor the use of knowledge gained even partially from one field to another without taking into account the inerrancy of less observable particularities, including those concerning to cultural heritage. In this context is looking through philosophy to put in evidence the forbidden regarding cultural heritage. Or, the philosophy approach through their instruments concerning social responsibilities in relation to the cultural heritage help to out-lined in another intra and inter-societal level that affected by the pandemic, post-pandemic and the belligerent state requires a reconceptualization in relation to the realities of society. It is also a change of optics both in the treatment of the respective issue and in the preparation of the social actors to build a balance among the valorization and use of the heritage not only culturally, but likewise environmentally. It is also with the understanding of the necessity of establishing critical thinking in all the actions that are taken to minimize the effects of the pandemic and post-pandemic on the preservation of the cultural heritage. Certainly, the presence of critical thinking in the responsibility over the cultural heritage contributes to the construction of axiological landmarks in the ethics of society interacting with the entire level of social relations, but also in relation to enviorement. However, the awareness that things are related to each other, communicate much more intensely than is known and influence each other contributes to the renewal and perpetuation of the cultural and envioremental heritage