Decellularized fresh homografts for pulmonary valve replacement: A decade of clinical experience
Close
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
391 0
SM ISO690:2012
SARIKOUCH, Samir, HORKE, Alexander, TUDORACHE, Igor, BEERBAUM, Philipp, WESTHOFF-BLECK, Mechthild, BOETHIG, Dietmar, REPIN, Oleg, MANIUC, Liviu, CIUBOTARU, Anatol, HAVERICH, Axel, CEBOTARI, Serghei. Decellularized fresh homografts for pulmonary valve replacement: A decade of clinical experience. In: European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2016, nr. 2(50), pp. 281-290. ISSN 1010-7940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw050
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery
Numărul 2(50) / 2016 / ISSN 1010-7940 /ISSNe 1873-734X

Decellularized fresh homografts for pulmonary valve replacement: A decade of clinical experience

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw050

Pag. 281-290

Sarikouch Samir1, Horke Alexander1, Tudorache Igor1, Beerbaum Philipp1, Westhoff-Bleck Mechthild1, Boethig Dietmar1, Repin Oleg2, Maniuc Liviu2, Ciubotaru Anatol, Haverich Axel1, Cebotari Serghei1
 
1 Hannover Medical School,
2 ”Nicolae Testemițanu” State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 16 ianuarie 2023


Rezumat

OBJECTIVES: Decellularized homografts have shown auspicious early results when used for pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) in congenital heart disease. The first clinical application in children was performed in 2002, initially using pre-seeding with endogenous progenitor cells. Since 2005, only non-seeded, fresh decellularized allografts have been implanted after spontaneous recellularization was observed by several groups. METHODS: A matched comparison of decellularized fresh pulmonary homografts (DPHs) implanted for PVR with cryopreserved pulmonary homografts (CHs) and bovine jugular vein conduits (BJVs) was conducted. Patients' age at implantation, the type of congenital malformation, number of previous cardiac operations and number of previous PVRs were considered for matching purposes, using an updated contemporary registry of right ventricular outflow tract conduits (2300 included conduits, >12 000 patient-years). RESULTS: A total of 131 DPHs were implanted for PVR in the period from January 2005 to September 2015. Of the 131, 38 were implanted within prospective trials on DPH from October 2014 onwards and were therefore not analysed within this study. A total of 93 DPH patients (58 males, 35 females) formed the study cohort and were matched to 93 CH and 93 BJV patients. The mean age at DPH implantation was 15.8 ± 10.21 years (CH 15.9 ± 10.4, BJV 15.6 ± 9.9) and the mean DPH diameter was 23.9 mm (CH 23.3 ± 3.6, BJV 19.9 ± 2.9). There was 100% follow-up for DPH, including 905 examinations with a mean follow-up of 4.59 ± 2.76 years (CH 7.4 ± 5.8, BJV 6.4 ± 3.8), amounting to 427.27 patient-years in total (CH 678.3, BJV 553.0). Tetralogy-of-Fallot was the most frequent malformation (DPH 50.5%, CH 54.8%, BJV 68.8%). At 10 years, the rate of freedom of explantation was 100% for DPH, 84.2% for CH (P = 0.01) and 84.3% for BJV (P= 0.01); the rate of freedom from explantation and peak trans-conduit gradient ≥50 mmHg was 86% for DPH, 64% for CH (n.s.) and 49% for BJV (P < 0.001); the rate of freedom from infective endocarditis (IE) was 100% for DPH, 97.3 ± 1.9% within the matched CH patients (P = 0.2) and 94.3 ± 2.8% for BJV patients (P = 0.06). DPH valve annulus diameters converged towards normal Z-values throughout the observation period, in contrast to other valve prostheses (BJV). CONCLUSIONS: Mid-term results of DPH for PVR confirm earlier results of reduced re-operation rates compared with CH and BJV.

Cuvinte-cheie
congenital heart disease, decellularization, homograft, Pulmonary valve replacement, tissue engineering