Identification Issues in Citizens’ Participation – Why are eIDAS-compliant Means of Identification not Common Standard
Close
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
291 1
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2022-12-03 16:37
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
004.738.5 (306)
Computer communication. Computer networks (535)
SM ISO690:2012
BADER, Lea, MULLER-TOROK, Robert. Identification Issues in Citizens’ Participation – Why are eIDAS-compliant Means of Identification not Common Standard. In: Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days , Ed. 4, 22-23 septembrie 2022, Budapesta. Viena: Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandels, 2022, pp. 118-122. ISBN 978-3-7089-2121-1; 978-3-903035-30-0. ISSN 2520-3401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3551504.3552325
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2022
Conferința "Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days "
4, Budapesta, Ungaria, 22-23 septembrie 2022

Identification Issues in Citizens’ Participation – Why are eIDAS-compliant Means of Identification not Common Standard

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3551504.3552325
CZU: 004.738.5

Pag. 118-122

Bader Lea1, Muller-Torok Robert2
 
1 District Authority Boblingen,
2 Hochschule für Öffentliche Verwaltung und Finanzen
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 3 noiembrie 2022


Rezumat

Citizens’ participation became quite common in municipal settings in Germany in the recent years. If the registration and identification methods used are examined, nearly each participation process relies on the possession of a simple email-address as a sole requirement. More secure methods, like introduced by the eIDAS-regulation and the Revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2) and hence commonly available, are totally neglected. The paper analyzes different types of citizens’ participation, derives the theoretical minimum requirements for proof of the identity of the participants and provides insights collected from interviews with organizers of participation processes. It concludes with recommendations which will hopefully lead to a more sustainable and resilient e-participation for the future.

Cuvinte-cheie
eIDAS, e-participation, Technology adoption