An examination of the juridical nature of the deeds derived from document forges – the usage of forged documents, the sale of forged documents; the possession of forged documents, is undertaken in the present article. It is argued that the „to hand in” and „to bring out” are the adequate terms for denoting those two situations, in which the „usage of forged documents” notion finds its expression. In the „hand in” situation, the usage of forged documents supposes the offender’s deprivation of these documents. Unlike the first situation, the „bring out” posture is not looking for a similar deprivation. Also, there are pointed out the differences between the notions „the selling of forged documents” and „the putting for sale of forged documents”. To exchange, to give as a present, to offer instead of some debt, or as a reward or any other types of unbinding, are not falling under the incidence of the „selling of forged documents” notion. Such activities can not be approbated on the basis of the art. 3611 or art. 3621 of the Penal Code of Republic of Moldova. And at last, but not least, it is pleaded for the „possession of forged documents” notion being interpreted as owning similar documents.