The concept of „court decision" is ubiquitous in the criminal law of the Republic of Moldova as an expression of the act of justice, but it is used in every way with different meaning. Although there are several incriminating rules in the Criminal Code that use this concept, it is noted that there is no single approach by the legislator, regarding the interpretation of the concept used in the art. 320 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, where the legislator opted for the use of a generic notion that awakens discussion on the issue of the extensive unfavorable interpretation of the criminal law. The use of polysemantic concepts in criminalizing texts is incompatible with the requirements of predictability of the law. However the general and abstract formulations can seriously affect the functionality of criminal law, its coherent and systemic application, which would distort the principle of law quality. In this sense, the study explores the docrinal and theoretical-applicative approaches regarding the interpretation of the concept of the „court decision”, and as a result of the research, we formulate pragmatic arguments regarding the legislative construction of the text of the law.