The particularities of planning the basic methodological components in the specific training of junior i dancers
Закрыть
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
1117 43
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-03-12 13:28
SM ISO690:2012
GRIGORE, Maria-Florica, CREȚU, Mirela Florina, BUFTEA, Victor, POTOP, Vladimir, GRIGORE, Virgil. The particularities of planning the basic methodological components in the specific training of junior i dancers. In: Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2019, nr. 1(19), pp. 2147-2151. ISSN -. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.s6322
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Journal of Physical Education and Sport
Numărul 1(19) / 2019 / ISSN - /ISSNe 2247-8051

The particularities of planning the basic methodological components in the specific training of junior i dancers

DOI:https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.s6322

Pag. 2147-2151

Grigore Maria-Florica1, Crețu Mirela Florina2, Buftea Victor3, Potop Vladimir1, Grigore Virgil4
 
1 Ecological University of Bucharest,
2 University of Pitesti,
3 State University of Physical Education and Sport,
4 National Palace of Children, Bucharest
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 22 decembrie 2019


Rezumat

Highlighting the particularities of planning the basic methodological components in the specific training of Junior I dancers. Material. Organizing a comparative study during the period 2011-2013, based on the analysis of the key methodological components in the specific training of Junior I dancers. The research was carried out in „Step in Two” Sports Club of Bucharest with the help of a group of 12 dancers of 12 to13 years old. The experimental methodology includes the following components: competition calendar, performance and training objectives, dynamics of physical fitness, structure of the basic training sessions, training requirements, directing and supervising the training sessions etc. Results. The share of the sports training components throughout the training year 2012 – 2013 was highlighted in comparison with the period 2011-2012, as follows: 26.36% of the training methodology was allocated to the technical training (29.87%); 19.88% (22.58%) to the artistic training, 21.50% (22.58%) to the physical training, 10.10% (14.58%) to the psychological training, 2.8% (3.58%) to the tactical training, 1.16% (2.63%) to the theoretical training and 17.00% (2.87%) to the integral training. As for the training of Junior I dancers for the Romanian National Championships (macro-structure 1), March 2013 compared with 2012, the share of the training components had the following values: 30.35% technical training (32.85%), 22.0% physical training (24.12%), 19.54% artistic training (21.83%), 11.64% psychological training (13.72%), 2.91% tactical training (3.33%), theoretical training 1.25% (1.66%) and integral training 12.27% (1.66%). Regarding the training for the German Open Championships (macro-structure 2), September 2013 in comparison with 2012, the integral training increased up to 23.16% (4.49%), the psychological training was 10.53% (15.73%), technical training 21.35% (25.84%), artistic training 20.53% (23.60%), physical training 20% (21.35%); 1.05% (4.0%) each were allocated for the tactical and the theoretical training. Conclusions. The comparative analysis of the training experimental methodology over the period 2011-2013 and the assessment of the results obtained by the dancers in the target competitions point out the share assigned to the components of sports training and the importance given to the integral training. A good analysis of sports training components in dance sport provides the favorable premises for including in the specific training methodology the key elements that condition the manifestation of the performance capacity and the achievement of superior results in the competition.

Cuvinte-cheie
dance sport, Integral training, methodology, performance, training components