Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
532 0 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
343+13(477) (1) |
Уголовное право. Уголовное судопроизводство. Криминология. Криминалистика (5341) |
Философия духа. Метафизика духовной жизни (171) |
SM ISO690:2012 CHERNIAK, Nataliia, IVANITSA, Artem. Features of providing the principle of comparison of the parties of the criminal process of Ukraine. In: Legea şi Viaţa, 2018, nr. 12/2(324), pp. 144-148. ISSN 2587-4365. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Legea şi Viaţa | ||||||
Numărul 12/2(324) / 2018 / ISSN 2587-4365 /ISSNe 2587-4373 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 343+13(477) | ||||||
Pag. 144-148 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The article examines the issues of ensuring the adversarial parties in the criminal process. The question of the role of the court as the main subject of the criminal process and the main functions of the court at the stage of judicial proceedings in the criminal case are considered in detail. The reasons, which lead the court to active probative activity during the competition of the parties, are considered. Also, this article is devoted to the scientific analysis of the current criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine in view of the problems of implementing the normative content of the principle of competition. Based on the results of the scientific search, appropriate conclusions were drawn. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie principle of competition, parties to criminal proceedings, “active” court, “passive” court, institute of investigating judge, investigating judge. |
||||||
|
DataCite XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Cerneak, N.P.</creatorName> <affiliation>Днепропетровский государственный университет внутренних дел, Ucraina</affiliation> </creator> <creator> <creatorName>Ivanița, A.V.</creatorName> <affiliation>Днепропетровский государственный университет внутренних дел, Ucraina</affiliation> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title xml:lang='en'>Features of providing the principle of comparison of the parties of the criminal process of Ukraine</title> </titles> <publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher> <publicationYear>2018</publicationYear> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISSN' relationType='IsPartOf'>2587-4365</relatedIdentifier> <subjects> <subject>principle of competition</subject> <subject>parties to criminal proceedings</subject> <subject>“active” court</subject> <subject>“passive” court</subject> <subject>institute of investigating judge</subject> <subject>investigating judge.</subject> <subject schemeURI='http://udcdata.info/' subjectScheme='UDC'>343+13(477)</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType='Issued'>2018-12-12</date> </dates> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Journal article</resourceType> <descriptions> <description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'><p>The article examines the issues of ensuring the adversarial parties in the criminal process. The question of the role of the court as the main subject of the criminal process and the main functions of the court at the stage of judicial proceedings in the criminal case are considered in detail. The reasons, which lead the court to active probative activity during the competition of the parties, are considered. Also, this article is devoted to the scientific analysis of the current criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine in view of the problems of implementing the normative content of the principle of competition. Based on the results of the scientific search, appropriate conclusions were drawn.</p></description> <description xml:lang='ru' descriptionType='Abstract'><p> В статье исследуются вопросы обеспечения состязательности сторон в уголовном процессе. Подробно рассмотрена роль суда как основного субъекта уголовного процесса, определены основные функции суда на этапе судебного рассмотрения уголовного дела. Проанализированы причины, побуждающие суд к активной доказательственной деятельности при состязательности сторон. Проведен научный анализ действующего уголовного процессуального законодательства Украины, учитывая проблемы реализации нормативного содержания принципа состязательности. На основе полученных результатов научного поиска сделаны соответствующие выводы</p></description> </descriptions> <formats> <format>application/pdf</format> </formats> </resource>