The influence of renal denervation on blood pressure variability in patients with resistant hypertension
Закрыть
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
54 0
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
616.12-008.331.1:616.61-036 (2)
Патология сердечно-сосудистой системы. Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания (1025)
Заболевания опорно-двигательной системы. Скелет и мышечная система (413)
SM ISO690:2012
MOISEEVA, Anna, CARAUSH, Alexandru, CIOBANU, Nicolae, MOSCALU, Vitalie, CALENICI, Oleg, BÎTCA, Angela, SAPOJNIC, Nadejda, CARAUSH, M.. The influence of renal denervation on blood pressure variability in patients with resistant hypertension. In: Journal of Hypertension, 2021, vol. 39, supl. nr. 1, p. e150. ISSN 0263-6352.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Journal of Hypertension
Volumul 39, Supliment nr. 1 / 2021 / ISSN 0263-6352 /ISSNe 1473-5598

The influence of renal denervation on blood pressure variability in patients with resistant hypertension

CZU: 616.12-008.331.1:616.61-036

Pag. e150-e150

Moiseeva Anna1, Caraush Alexandru1, Ciobanu Nicolae1, Moscalu Vitalie1, Calenici Oleg2, Bîtca Angela1, Sapojnic Nadejda1, Caraush M.3
 
1 Institute of Cardiology,
2 CHI Caux Vallee de Seine, Lillebonne,
3 University Hospital „Sf. Spiridon” Iasi
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 23 mai 2024


Rezumat

Objective: Comparative evaluation of the impact of renal denervation versus pharmacological treatment with sympathetic nervous system (SNS) blockers on blood pressure variability in patients with resistant hypertension. Design and method: 75 patients with resistant hypertension without comorbidities after a 3-week standardized treatment with Losartan, Amlodipine and Indapamide and confi rmation of their resistance were randomized into three groups, depending on medication supplimented to the previously administred: group I M - selective I1-imidazoline agonist Moxonidine, group II B – cardioselective beta-blocker Bisoprolol, group III D – renal artery denervation (RDN). Blood pressure variability assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) were determined at baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up. Results: The media/day and media/night systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability increased at the baseline in all three groups was reduced statistically signifi cant from 3 months of monitoring, reaching the maximum effect towards the end of the study, when its normal values were recorded in all observational groups. Although treatment group supplimented with Moxonidine demonstrated an effect superior to that with Bisoprolol, and RDN - superiority to both, all three schemes had an authentic dynamics in improving SBP at 6 months of evaluation (p<0,001) (Fig.1). The evolution of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) media/day and media/night variability noted a benefi cial effect, starting with 3 months, the improvement of this parameter being maintained until the end of the study. Although the reduction of DBP variability was statistically authentic in all three groups at all stages of evaluation, the Bisoprolol treatment group noted a smaller effect in improving this parameter, the higher net effect being manifested by the RDN patients group (p<0,001) (Fig.2). Conclusions: RDN in patients with resistant hypertension reduced statistically signifi cant SBP and DBP variability starting with 3 months of follow-up and reaching maximum effect at the end of the study, simultaneously demonstrating superiority over treatment with SNS blockers.