Radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer
Закрыть
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
56 0
SM ISO690:2012
PITERSCHI, Alexandru, MUSTEA, Anatol. Radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer. In: New horizons in urology: The 8th congress on urology, dialysis and kidney transplant from Republic of Moldova with international participation, 7-9 iunie 2023, Chişinău. Chişinău: Taicom (Ridgeone Group), 2023, p. 359. ISSN 2558-815X.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
New horizons in urology 2023
Conferința "New horizons in urology"
Chişinău, Moldova, 7-9 iunie 2023

Radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer


Pag. 359-359

Piterschi Alexandru, Mustea Anatol
 
Institute of Oncology
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 27 martie 2024


Rezumat

Introduction. Optimal treatment approaches for locally advanced prostate cancer remain controversial and there are currently no standard treatments. According to recent papers, radical prostatectomy in men with locally advanced prostate cancers seems to effect improvement in both cancer specific and overall survival rates in comparison to radiation with androgen deprivation therapy. The aim. This study was to report oncological outcomes of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy in our department and to assess the role of radical prostatectomy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Methods. This study included 150 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy in our department. Oncologic outcomes comprised positive surgical margins, nodal involvement, ISUP grade, presence of perineural and lymphovascular invasion. Results. Median age of the patients was 65±4 (51-79) years. Based on postoperative pathology, form 150 patients, 51 (34%) were pT3, from whom 37% (19) pT3a and 63% (32) pT3b. The rates of positive surgical margins in the entire cohort with stage pT3 disease was 20% (10), N1 were 13,7% (7). In pT3a R1 were 5,2% (1), in pT3b R1were 28% (9), N1were18,7% (6). ISUP 1: 5,88% (3), ISUP 2: 27,45% (14), ISUP 3: 39,21% (20), ISUP 4: 13,7% (7), ISUP 5: 17,64% (9). Perineural invasion was present in 96% (49) of cases, limfovascular in 43,13% (22). Conclusions. Radical prostatectomy could be an option for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.