Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
111 3 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-05-25 20:14 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
331.52-026.564.2:303.4 (1) |
Рынок труда. Занятость (479) |
Методы общественных наук. Методы и виды социологических исследований (177) |
SM ISO690:2012 BÎRCĂ, Alic. Analiza comparativă a formelor de flexibilizare a muncii la nivel organizațional. In: Paradigme moderne în dezvoltarea economiei naționale și mondiale, 28-29 octombrie 2022, Chişinău. Chişinau, Moldova: Centrul Editorial-Poligrafic al USM, 2022, pp. 224-234. ISBN 978-9975-62-488-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7523950 |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Paradigme moderne în dezvoltarea economiei naționale și mondiale 2022 | ||||||
Conferința "Modern paradigms in the development of the national and world economy" Chişinău, Moldova, 28-29 octombrie 2022 | ||||||
|
||||||
DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7523950 | ||||||
CZU: 331.52-026.564.2:303.4 | ||||||
Pag. 224-234 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The present scientific approach approaches the comparative analysis of the forms of work flexibility at the organizational level. Currently, organizations can apply different forms of work organization, depending on the objectives pursued. In turn, government institutions promote flexible forms of work at the national level to provide opportunities for all categories of the workforce to become employed. In this paper, we have analysed 10 flexible forms of work organization that can have an impact on the employment level. Methodologically, a questionnaire was developed that included 10 variables, each variable representing a form of work organization. Organizations participating in the survey had to rate each variable according to the Likert scale from 1 to 5. The analysis of the results was carried out by comparison according to the size of the organization. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie workforce, flexicurity, work flexibility, work organization, work schedule |
||||||
|
Cerif XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <CERIF xmlns='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1' xsi:schemaLocation='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1 http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF-1.5/CERIF_1.5_1.xsd' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' release='1.5' date='2012-10-07' sourceDatabase='Output Profile'> <cfResPubl> <cfResPublId>ibn-ResPubl-199004</cfResPublId> <cfResPublDate>2022</cfResPublDate> <cfStartPage>224</cfStartPage> <cfISBN>978-9975-62-488-6</cfISBN> <cfURI>https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/vizualizare_articol/199004</cfURI> <cfTitle cfLangCode='RO' cfTrans='o'>Analiza comparativă a formelor de flexibilizare a muncii la nivel organizațional</cfTitle> <cfKeyw cfLangCode='RO' cfTrans='o'>workforce; flexicurity; work flexibility; work organization; work schedule</cfKeyw> <cfAbstr cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'><p>The present scientific approach approaches the comparative analysis of the forms of work flexibility at the organizational level. Currently, organizations can apply different forms of work organization, depending on the objectives pursued. In turn, government institutions promote flexible forms of work at the national level to provide opportunities for all categories of the workforce to become employed. In this paper, we have analysed 10 flexible forms of work organization that can have an impact on the employment level. Methodologically, a questionnaire was developed that included 10 variables, each variable representing a form of work organization. Organizations participating in the survey had to rate each variable according to the Likert scale from 1 to 5. The analysis of the results was carried out by comparison according to the size of the organization.</p></cfAbstr> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>eda2d9e9-34c5-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>759af938-34ae-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2022T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>e601872f-4b7e-4d88-929f-7df027b226c9</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>40e90e2f-446d-460a-98e5-5dce57550c48</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2022T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfPers_ResPubl> <cfPersId>ibn-person-384</cfPersId> <cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2022T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfPers_ResPubl> </cfResPubl> <cfPers> <cfPersId>ibn-Pers-384</cfPersId> <cfPersName_Pers> <cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-384-2</cfPersNameId> <cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2022T24:00:00</cfStartDate> <cfFamilyNames>Bîrcă</cfFamilyNames> <cfFirstNames>Alic</cfFirstNames> </cfPersName_Pers> </cfPers> </CERIF>