Urgent surgery versus anticoagulation for treatment of superficial vein thrombosis in patients with varicose veins: A prospective observational cohort study
Закрыть
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
260 0
SM ISO690:2012
CASIAN, Dumitru, BZOVÎI, Florin, CULIUC, Vasile, GUTSU, Eugene. Urgent surgery versus anticoagulation for treatment of superficial vein thrombosis in patients with varicose veins: A prospective observational cohort study. In: Vasa - European Journal of Vascular Medicine, 2022, nr. 3(51), pp. 174-181. ISSN 0301-1526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001000
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Vasa - European Journal of Vascular Medicine
Numărul 3(51) / 2022 / ISSN 0301-1526 /ISSNe 1664-2872

Urgent surgery versus anticoagulation for treatment of superficial vein thrombosis in patients with varicose veins: A prospective observational cohort study

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001000

Pag. 174-181

Casian Dumitru12, Bzovîi Florin12, Culiuc Vasile12, Gutsu Eugene1
 
1 ”Nicolae Testemițanu” State University of Medicine and Pharmacy,
2 Emergency Institute of Medicine
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 29 iunie 2022


Rezumat

Background: We performed a prospective observational study to compare the results of surgery and anticoagulation in patients with superficial vein thrombosis (SVT). Patients and methods: A total of 190 patients (195 limbs) with varicose veins and SVT were included and treated by anticoagulation or by surgery. Patients were followed-up during 6 months. The primary outcome for treatment efficacy was the composite rate of SVT extension/recurrence; deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). The primary outcome for safety was the rate of wound complications and rate of bleedings. Results: Surgery was performed in 85 (44.7%) patients and 105 patients (5 with bilateral SVT) were treated conservatively. In the whole study cohort the primary outcome for treatment efficacy was registered in 15 (7.6%) cases: 9/85 (10.5%) in surgical group and 6/110 (5.4%) in anticoagulation group. Nine patients treated with surgery were diagnosed with postoperative DVT. In anticoagulation group SVT extension occurred in 3 limbs; SVT recurrence in 2 and DVT in one. There were no cases of PE or death during the follow-up. Time-to-event analysis demonstrated no significant difference between groups (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.17-1.34). The total length of the thrombus was associated with primary efficacy outcome in surgical group (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.11); and duration of anticoagulation (HR 0.91 per day; 95% CI 0.83-0.99) and value of Caprini score (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.1-3.14) in anticoagulation group. Six (7%) wound complications were registered after surgery and 6 (5.71%) bleedings during anticoagulation. Conclusions: Urgent surgery is not associated with reduction of venous thromboembolism compared to anticoagulation in treatment of patients with SVT and varicose veins during 6-months follow-up. However, in patients with isolated thrombosis of varicose tributaries or with limited involvement of the saphenous trunk surgery is relatively safe.

Cuvinte-cheie
Anticoagulation, Superficial vein thrombosis, surgery, venous thromboembolism

Cerif XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<CERIF xmlns='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1' xsi:schemaLocation='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1 http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF-1.5/CERIF_1.5_1.xsd' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' release='1.5' date='2012-10-07' sourceDatabase='Output Profile'>
<cfResPubl>
<cfResPublId>ibn-ResPubl-160037</cfResPublId>
<cfResPublDate>2022-05-01</cfResPublDate>
<cfVol>51</cfVol>
<cfIssue>3</cfIssue>
<cfStartPage>174</cfStartPage>
<cfISSN>0301-1526</cfISSN>
<cfURI>https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/vizualizare_articol/160037</cfURI>
<cfTitle cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'>Urgent surgery versus anticoagulation for treatment of superficial vein thrombosis in patients with varicose veins: A prospective observational cohort study</cfTitle>
<cfKeyw cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'>Anticoagulation; Superficial vein thrombosis; surgery; venous thromboembolism</cfKeyw>
<cfAbstr cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'><p>Background: We performed a prospective observational study to compare the results of surgery and anticoagulation in patients with superficial vein thrombosis (SVT). Patients and methods: A total of 190 patients (195 limbs) with varicose veins and SVT were included and treated by anticoagulation or by surgery. Patients were followed-up during 6 months. The primary outcome for treatment efficacy was the composite rate of SVT extension/recurrence; deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). The primary outcome for safety was the rate of wound complications and rate of bleedings. Results: Surgery was performed in 85 (44.7%) patients and 105 patients (5 with bilateral SVT) were treated conservatively. In the whole study cohort the primary outcome for treatment efficacy was registered in 15 (7.6%) cases: 9/85 (10.5%) in surgical group and 6/110 (5.4%) in anticoagulation group. Nine patients treated with surgery were diagnosed with postoperative DVT. In anticoagulation group SVT extension occurred in 3 limbs; SVT recurrence in 2 and DVT in one. There were no cases of PE or death during the follow-up. Time-to-event analysis demonstrated no significant difference between groups (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.17-1.34). The total length of the thrombus was associated with primary efficacy outcome in surgical group (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.11); and duration of anticoagulation (HR 0.91 per day; 95% CI 0.83-0.99) and value of Caprini score (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.1-3.14) in anticoagulation group. Six (7%) wound complications were registered after surgery and 6 (5.71%) bleedings during anticoagulation. Conclusions: Urgent surgery is not associated with reduction of venous thromboembolism compared to anticoagulation in treatment of patients with SVT and varicose veins during 6-months follow-up. However, in patients with isolated thrombosis of varicose tributaries or with limited involvement of the saphenous trunk surgery is relatively safe.</p></cfAbstr>
<cfResPubl_Class>
<cfClassId>eda2d9e9-34c5-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>759af938-34ae-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2022-05-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfResPubl_Class>
<cfResPubl_Class>
<cfClassId>e601872f-4b7e-4d88-929f-7df027b226c9</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>40e90e2f-446d-460a-98e5-5dce57550c48</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2022-05-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfResPubl_Class>
<cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfPersId>ibn-person-10769</cfPersId>
<cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2022-05-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfPersId>ibn-person-36022</cfPersId>
<cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2022-05-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfPersId>ibn-person-19280</cfPersId>
<cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2022-05-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfPersId>ibn-person-18819</cfPersId>
<cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2022-05-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfFedId>
<cfFedIdId>ibn-doi-160037</cfFedIdId>
<cfFedId>10.1024/0301-1526/a001000</cfFedId>
<cfStartDate>2022-05-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
<cfFedId_Class>
<cfClassId>31d222b4-11e0-434b-b5ae-088119c51189</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>bccb3266-689d-4740-a039-c96594b4d916</cfClassSchemeId>
</cfFedId_Class>
<cfFedId_Srv>
<cfSrvId>5123451</cfSrvId>
<cfClassId>eda2b2e2-34c5-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>5a270628-f593-4ff4-a44a-95660c76e182</cfClassSchemeId>
</cfFedId_Srv>
</cfFedId>
</cfResPubl>
<cfPers>
<cfPersId>ibn-Pers-10769</cfPersId>
<cfPersName_Pers>
<cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-10769-3</cfPersNameId>
<cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2022-05-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
<cfFamilyNames>Касьян</cfFamilyNames>
<cfFirstNames>Дмитрий</cfFirstNames>
</cfPersName_Pers>
</cfPers>
<cfPers>
<cfPersId>ibn-Pers-36022</cfPersId>
<cfPersName_Pers>
<cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-36022-3</cfPersNameId>
<cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2022-05-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
<cfFamilyNames>Bzovîi</cfFamilyNames>
<cfFirstNames>Florin</cfFirstNames>
</cfPersName_Pers>
</cfPers>
<cfPers>
<cfPersId>ibn-Pers-19280</cfPersId>
<cfPersName_Pers>
<cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-19280-3</cfPersNameId>
<cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2022-05-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
<cfFamilyNames>Кулюк</cfFamilyNames>
<cfFirstNames>Василий</cfFirstNames>
</cfPersName_Pers>
</cfPers>
<cfPers>
<cfPersId>ibn-Pers-18819</cfPersId>
<cfPersName_Pers>
<cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-18819-3</cfPersNameId>
<cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2022-05-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
<cfFamilyNames>Gutsu</cfFamilyNames>
<cfFirstNames>Eugene</cfFirstNames>
<cfFamilyNames>Гуцу</cfFamilyNames>
<cfFirstNames>Евгений</cfFirstNames>
</cfPersName_Pers>
</cfPers>
<cfSrv>
<cfSrvId>5123451</cfSrvId>
<cfName cfLangCode='en' cfTrans='o'>CrossRef DOI prefix service</cfName>
<cfDescr cfLangCode='en' cfTrans='o'>The service of issuing DOI prefixes to publishers</cfDescr>
<cfKeyw cfLangCode='en' cfTrans='o'>persistent identifier; Digital Object Identifier</cfKeyw>
</cfSrv>
</CERIF>