Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
887 5 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-05-20 23:08 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
347.9:347.772 (1) |
Гражданское процессуальное право. Судоустройство (965) |
Коммерческое (торговое) право (1306) |
SM ISO690:2012 CLĂTINICI, Iurie, COŞLEŢ, Valeriu. Rolul instanţelor judiciare în protecţia mărcilor (studiu asupra unor cazuri judiciare). In: Intellectus, 2003, nr. 2, pp. 36-47. ISSN 1810-7079. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Intellectus | ||||||
Numărul 2 / 2003 / ISSN 1810-7079 /ISSNe 1810-7087 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 347.9:347.772 | ||||||
Pag. 36-47 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
T he legislation of the Republic of Moldova has perfectly been harmonized with the
international treaties to which our country is party. The industrial property objects
(trade and service marks, inventions etc.) are only registered or refused on the basis of the
legislation in force, depending on the examination (searching) results. However, this fact
does not prevent the State Agency on Industrial Property Protection from revoking the title of
protection under the basis of a reasoned opposition, disclosing new data and circumstances.
The AGEPI is a specialized body with unique authority in the Republic of Moldova in the
industrial property protection field, elaborating the strategy of development of the industrial
property protection system and promoting the state policy in the said field (p. 1,2 and 10 of
the Statute). Therefore, in the examination of concrete cases the courts shall take into consideration
the position of the AGEPI, of the experts with a wide experience obtained within
the Agency, of the Methodical Board and the Appeals Board, acting in the interests of the
State.
Unfortunately the courts, despite the provisions of the legislation in force, sometimes take
contrary decisions, including the international norms. The Supreme Court of Justice does not
accept the review of the decisions and the General Prosecutor’s Office refuses to intervene
with solicitation in the interests of the law or appeal of revocation. The Article, giving concrete
examples, denotes that what is prohibited by Law, can easily be obtained by judgment. |
||||||
|
Google Scholar Export
<meta name="citation_title" content="Rolul instanţelor judiciare în protecţia mărcilor (studiu asupra unor cazuri judiciare)"> <meta name="citation_author" content="Clătinici Iurie"> <meta name="citation_author" content="Coşleţ Valeriu"> <meta name="citation_publication_date" content="2003/06/02"> <meta name="citation_journal_title" content="Intellectus"> <meta name="citation_issue" content="2"> <meta name="citation_firstpage" content="36"> <meta name="citation_lastpage" content="47"> <meta name="citation_pdf_url" content="https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/Rolul%20instantelor%20judiciare%20in%20protectia%20marcilor.pdf">