Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
1655 32 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-06-08 00:06 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
341.217(4)+341.223.7 (11) |
Persoane și obiecte ale dreptului internațional (1006) |
SM ISO690:2012 SUCEVEANU, Natalia. Câteva reflecții în legătură cu soluțiile legale și doctrinare privind retragerea din Uniunea Europeană. In: Revista Moldovenească de Drept Internaţional şi Relaţii Internaţionale, 2016, nr. 3(11), pp. 315-324. ISSN 1857-1999. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Revista Moldovenească de Drept Internaţional şi Relaţii Internaţionale | |||||||
Numărul 3(11) / 2016 / ISSN 1857-1999 /ISSNe 2345-1963 | |||||||
|
|||||||
CZU: 341.217(4)+341.223.7 | |||||||
JEL: K33, K49, F55 | |||||||
Pag. 315-324 | |||||||
|
|||||||
Descarcă PDF | |||||||
Rezumat | |||||||
The article analyses the legal basis for a Member State to withdraw from the Union, as provided by art.50 of the Treaty on the European Union, considering the UK example. Art.50 allows a Member State of the European Union to notify its intention to withdraw and compels the Union to negotiate with the state in question a withdrawal agreement. The exit process from the EU is not without uncertainty. As art. 50 has never been used by any state, there is no clear framework on the way to proceed with its application. Immediately after the announcement of the referendum results, the heads of the key EU institutions have ruled out any speculation on whether or not art. 50 could be bypassed by some means or other. On the other hand, there are voices saying that art.50 is not the only exit mechanism from the EU, suggesting several alternatives for art. 50. Likewise, art. 50 provides that the withdrawal agreement will set down the arrangements for withdrawal, taking account the framework for its future relationship with EU. It is the last phrase that seemed to raise several complicated discussions regarding the scope of the withdrawal agreement. Regardless of the form and content of the withdrawal agreement, it shall have to be in consonance with EU Treaties, while the Court of Justice of the European Union could be asked to rule on its compatibility with EU primary law. |
|||||||
Cuvinte-cheie acord de retragere, articolul 50, procedura de retragere, stat membru care se retrage, Marea Britanie, stat membru, Uniunea Europeană |
|||||||
|