Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
1042 4 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2021-03-15 23:59 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
821.133.1.09 (47) |
Literatură galo-romanică (Literatură franceză) (103) |
SM ISO690:2012 POPA (DIACON), Oxana. Filiations barthesienes dans la theorie sociocritique barthes’s influence in the critic al social theory. In: Metaliteratură, 2015, nr. 3(41), pp. 43-46. ISSN 1857-1905. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Metaliteratură | ||||||
Numărul 3(41) / 2015 / ISSN 1857-1905 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 821.133.1.09 | ||||||
Pag. 43-46 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
Roland Barthes is a great sociocritic, because he has the merit to develop the problem of fields in semiotics, literary psychoanalysis and socio-historical interpretation. The social criticism is a continuation of Barthes’s writing, considering the fact that the wrinting represents “the relationship between creation and society” scored in the History. The writing is historic not only because it is a social practice, perceived in relation to the communicative act, but also because when we write, we enroll in a historical tradition and the status of text changes during the historical evolution. Starting from the idea that any text is an intertext, by analogy, the reality is seen as an interconnection between opera and reality, as a dialogue between them. The writing preserves the previous meanings, saved by the history and implemented by the society. So, the text allows the incorporation of different codes, formulas, social languages, etc. Aspects of Barthes’s thinking were resumed and fructified by various theoreticians of social criticism. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie Lanson, Roland Barthes, Zima, Cros, sociocritic, social criticism. |
||||||
|