The definition of the concept of culture in correlation with the notion of civilization were used by the scientists in the period of western enlightening and romanticism at the origin of which there are the anthropology researchers: Edward Tylor, Conte de Gobineau, Georges de Lapouge, Eugen Pittard, Otto Ammon, Will Durant, Iu. M. Lotman, Max Weber, Eduard Meyer. The methodology of the culture science exercises a complex study in the determination of another type of culture – civic culture reflected in G. Almond’s and S. Verba’s studies about a modern realistic pluralistic culture bazed on the communication and persuasion, a consuming and diversity culture. This research confirms the actuality of the study of the cultural model through the democratic cultural criteria and the prism of the convenient time – KAIROS and the characteristics of a democratic personality. This research is profoundly elaborated on the basis of the theories of domain in the Romanian philosophy of C. Radulescu-Motru about politicianism and the formation of the interiorized and not exteriorized culture manifested by objects and materials, taking into consideration the scientific-psycologic conception about the valne of the soul in the importance of culture. This scientific novelty inaugurated by C. Radulescu-Motru is exactly in unison with the cultural model given by C. Noika about the unity of social conscience and that of the soul of the culture that considers that foreign culture imported from aboard can’t substitute the real consciencios culture of the society. In such a way we confirm the convenient moment (kairos) in the importance of the cultural model to which the people adhere as to a essential factor in its flourishing development and its affirmation in an universal plan. It is mentioned the contribution of philosopher T. Vianu about the cultural will and the cultural values determined as a cultural act that develops the general notion of culture with the scientific novelty of two essential components: „cultural will” and „faith”. „The genesis of the culture forms” is reflected on the basis of P. P. Negulescu’s worhs, elucidation of cultural anthropology – through the prism of anthropologist Șt. L. Mureshanu, the cultural constitutive elements from „The Introduction of the philosophy of culture” of A. Dragomir, St. Covalschi, G. Liiceanu. We resort to the interpretation of the culture types by Lucian Blaga („The Thriology of Culture”) about the „minor” cultures (ethnographical) and „major” (monumental) ones.