Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
492 17 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-05-08 14:56 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
327(100-87)327.54+327(479) (1) |
Relații internaționale. Politică internațională. Activitate internațională. Politică externă (1447) |
SM ISO690:2012 MAISAIA, Vakhtang. The Caucasus geopolitical dilemma – new cold war implications and peaceful trend: regional public chamber initiative. In: Studii naționale de securitate, 2020, nr. 1(1), pp. 157-168. ISSN 2587-3822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.581/zenodo.3989386 |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Studii naționale de securitate | ||||||
Numărul 1(1) / 2020 / ISSN 2587-3822 | ||||||
|
||||||
DOI:https://doi.org/10.581/zenodo.3989386 | ||||||
CZU: 327(100-87)327.54+327(479) | ||||||
Pag. 157-168 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The paper included reviewing of fierce geopolitical competition between Global Powers over the hegemony positions in the Caucasus region. The geopolitical security when Global Powers flex mussels and are on the way to achieve their missions and goals with assistance of new ideological and even definitional threshold: Eurasianism vs. Atlanticism induces emergence of confrontation modality for the regional security perceptions not promoting peace and stability. The new security dilemma for the region is really identified as follows: Russia/China vs. USA/EU as new „loosen” bipolarity competition with proposing proper geopolitical projects, like „One Belt, One Road”, „Southern Stream Gas Pipeline”, etc. This is an interesting point to be considered how the competition affects formulating various foreign policy implications of the regional actors and how the nations, at least, at public level should create sound peace reached consensus for achieving stability and avoid fierce competition of Global Powers consequences of a New Cold War, consequences in case of creating a Regional Public Chamber |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie “Silk Road”, Public Chamber, “One Belt, One Road”, USA, Russia, China, New Cold War, Caucaz, interes geostrategic, Putere Globală, SUA, Rusia, China, noul război rece, «Шелковый путь», Общественная палата, «Один пояс, один путь», США, Россия, Китай, Новая холодная война., «Route de la soie», Chambre publique, «One Belt, One Road», États-Unis, Russie, Chine, nouvelle guerre froide |
||||||
|
DataCite XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'> <identifier identifierType='DOI'>10.581/zenodo.3989386</identifier> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Maisaia, V.</creatorName> <affiliation>Caucasus International University, Georgia</affiliation> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title xml:lang='en'>The Caucasus geopolitical dilemma – new cold war implications and peaceful trend: regional public chamber initiative</title> </titles> <publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher> <publicationYear>2020</publicationYear> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISSN' relationType='IsPartOf'>2587-3822</relatedIdentifier> <subjects> <subject>“Silk Road”</subject> <subject>Public Chamber</subject> <subject>“One Belt</subject> <subject>One Road”</subject> <subject>USA</subject> <subject>Russia</subject> <subject>China</subject> <subject>New Cold War</subject> <subject>Caucaz</subject> <subject>interes geostrategic</subject> <subject>Putere Globală</subject> <subject>SUA</subject> <subject>Rusia</subject> <subject>China</subject> <subject>noul război rece</subject> <subject>«Шелковый путь»</subject> <subject>Общественная палата</subject> <subject>«Один пояс</subject> <subject>один путь»</subject> <subject>США</subject> <subject>Россия</subject> <subject>Китай</subject> <subject>Новая холодная война.</subject> <subject>«Route de la soie»</subject> <subject>Chambre publique</subject> <subject>«One Belt</subject> <subject>One Road»</subject> <subject>États-Unis</subject> <subject>Russie</subject> <subject>Chine</subject> <subject>nouvelle guerre froide</subject> <subject schemeURI='http://udcdata.info/' subjectScheme='UDC'>327(100-87)327.54+327(479)</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType='Issued'>2020-07-01</date> </dates> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Journal article</resourceType> <descriptions> <description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'><p><em>The paper included reviewing of fierce geopolitical competition between Global Powers over the hegemony positions in the Caucasus region. The geopolitical security when Global Powers flex mussels and are on the way to achieve their missions and goals with assistance of new ideological and even definitional threshold: Eurasianism vs. Atlanticism induces emergence of confrontation modality for the regional security perceptions not promoting peace and stability. The new security dilemma for the region is really identified as follows: Russia/China vs. USA/EU as new „loosen” bipolarity competition with proposing proper geopolitical projects, like „One Belt, One Road”, „Southern Stream Gas Pipeline”, etc. This is an interesting point to be considered how the competition affects formulating various foreign policy implications of the regional actors and how the nations, at least, at public level should create sound peace reached consensus for achieving stability and avoid fierce competition of Global Powers consequences of a New Cold War, consequences in case of creating a Regional Public Chamber</em></p></description> <description xml:lang='ro' descriptionType='Abstract'><p><em>Articolul</em><em> </em><em>de față se referă la revizuirea concurenței geopolitice acerbe dintre Puterile Globale asupra pozițiilor hegemonice din Caucaz. Securitatea geopolitică în condițiile în care Puterile Globale sunt pe cale să își îndeplinească interesele și obiectivele cu ajutorul unui nou prag ideologic: eurasiatismul vs. atlantismul, provoacă apariția unei modalități de confruntare pentru percepțiile de securitate regională, care nu promovează pacea și stabilitatea. Noua</em><em> </em><em>dilemă</em><em> </em><em>de securitate pentru regiune este identificată astfel: Rusia / China vs. SUA / UE ca fiind o nouă competiție a bipolarității cu introducerea unor proiecte geopolitice adecvate. Acest lucru este important de luat în considerație în condițiile în care concurența afectează formularea diverselor implicații de politică externă ale actorilor regionali și modul în care națiunile, cel puțin la nivel public, ar trebui să creeze o pace solidă la care se ajunge printr-un consens.</em></p></description> <description xml:lang='ru' descriptionType='Abstract'><p><em>Доклад включает обзор ожесточенного геополитического соперничества между мировыми державами за господствующие позиции в Кавказском регионе. Геополитическая безопасность, когда мировые державы проявляют гибкость и идут к достижению своих миссий и целей, применяя новые идеологические и терминологические понятия: евразийство против атлантизма вызывает конфронтации для представлений о региональной безопасности, не способствуя таким образом миру и стабильности. Новая дилемма безопасности региона в целом определяется следующим образом: Россия / Китай против США / ЕС как новое «ослабление» биполярного соперничества с предложением соответствующих геополитических проектов, таких как «Один пояс, один путь», «Газопровод Южный поток» и т.п. в противодействии проектам «Шелковый путь», Инициативы Восточного партнерства и т. д. Это представляющий интерес момент, с целью рассмотрения, как соперничество влияет на создание различных внешнеполитических последствий региональных игроков и как страны, по крайней мере, на общественном уровне, должны участвовать в создании прочного мира, согласия ради достижения стабильности и избегания ожесточенной конкуренции в виде новой холодной войны между мировыми державами в случае создания Общественной палаты.</em></p></description> <description xml:lang='fr' descriptionType='Abstract'><p><em>Le</em><em> </em><em>document</em><em> </em><em>comprend</em><em> </em><em>une</em><em> </em><em>analyse</em><em> </em><em>de</em><em> </em><em>la concurrence géopolitique féroce entre les puissances mondiales sur les positions d'hégémonie dans la région du Caucase. La sécurité géopolitique lorsque les puissances mondiales fléchissent les muscles et sont sur la bonne voie pour atteindre leurs missions et objectifs avec l'aide d'un nouveau seuil idéologique et même définitionnel: l'eurasisme contre l'atlantisme induit l'émergence d'une modalité de confrontation pour les perceptions de la sécurité régionale et il ne favorise pas la paix et stabilité. Le nouveau dilemme de sécurité pour la région est vraiment identifié comme suit: Russie / Chine vs USA / UE en tant que nouvelle compétition de bipolarité «desserrée» en proposant des projets géopolitiques appropriés, comme «One Belt, One Road», «Southern Stream Gas Pipeline», etc. contre le projet «Route de la soie», l’initiative de Partenariat oriental, etc. visant à parvenir à un consensus et à la stabilité et à éviter la concurrence féroce des puissances mondiales en raison des conséquences de la nouvelle guerre froide en cas de création d'une chambre publique</em></p></description> </descriptions> <formats> <format>application/pdf</format> </formats> </resource>