Este cunoscut faptul ca expertii, utilizand cuno tintele lor de specialitate, contribuie  cu succes la stabilirea  adevarului in cauzele penale, civile   i  contraventionale, prin efectuarea expertizelor judiciare Spre deosebire de alte procedee probatorii, expertiza judiciara este eel mai putin supusa subiectivismului in aprecierea starilor de fapt i imprejurarilor care constituie probe in cauza cercetata  sau  examinata  in  instanta  de judecata. Totodata , este de mentionat ca i expertii uneori comit  anumite  gre eli,  iar rapoartele de expertiza au uneori anumite lacune, care pot fi  reparate  prin  audierea expertilor

It is well known that the special knowledge of experts is successfully used by conducting forensic expertise for establishing the truth in criminal, civil and misdemeanor cases. Unlike other legal resources of proof, judicial forensic expertise is the least liable to subjectivism in assessing the facts and circumstances that constitute evidence in the case investigated or examined in court. At the same time, it should be noted that experts sometimes make certain mistakes and admit certain shortcomings, which can be remedied by hearing them