Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
745 24 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-01-16 16:13 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
[324+342.8:004.75](430) (1) |
Alegeri. Plebicist. Referendum. Campanie electorală. Corupție electorală. Vicierea alegerilor. Rezultatele alegerilor (119) |
Lege electorală. Votare. Sisteme electorale (102) |
Comunicații între calculatoare. Rețele de calculatoare (519) |
SM ISO690:2012 ARMBRUSTER, Evelyn, PAUTSCH, Arne. Safeguards against electoral fraud vs. accessibility and citizens’ convenience – Neet for changes in the German electoral system. In: Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days , Ed. 3, 2-3 mai 2019, Budapesta. Viena, Austria: Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandels, 2019, pp. 71-80. ISBN 978-3-7089-1898-3; 978-3-903035-24-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v335.5 |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2019 | ||||||
Conferința "Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days " 3, Budapesta, Ungaria, 2-3 mai 2019 | ||||||
|
||||||
DOI:https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v335.5 | ||||||
CZU: [324+342.8:004.75](430) | ||||||
Pag. 71-80 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
Democratic elections are the basis of democracy. Allegations of electoral fraud lead to protests and violent clashes all over the world. In order to avoid such scenes, the electoral system has to be reliable and transparent. At the same time, voter turnout must be kept high in order to maintain the will of the people in a representative way. However, the required accessibility and citizens’ convenience often seems to be in conflict with system security. Higher safeguards often comes with more formalisation and therefore less flexibility for the individual. This article shows how the German electoral system can be improved, while combining safety standards with citizens’ convenience. For this purpose, significant weaknesses of voting in polling stations, postal vote, the count of votes and digitalization, especially e-voting are identified. To remedy these weaknesses, solutions from various European democracies are presented as reform approaches for the German electoral system. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie electoral fraud, e-voting, postal vote, voting in polling stations, count of votes |
||||||
|