Safeguards against electoral fraud vs. accessibility and citizens’ convenience – Neet for changes in the German electoral system
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
745 24
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-01-16 16:13
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
[324+342.8:004.75](430) (1)
Alegeri. Plebicist. Referendum. Campanie electorală. Corupție electorală. Vicierea alegerilor. Rezultatele alegerilor (119)
Lege electorală. Votare. Sisteme electorale (102)
Comunicații între calculatoare. Rețele de calculatoare (519)
SM ISO690:2012
ARMBRUSTER, Evelyn, PAUTSCH, Arne. Safeguards against electoral fraud vs. accessibility and citizens’ convenience – Neet for changes in the German electoral system. In: Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days , Ed. 3, 2-3 mai 2019, Budapesta. Viena, Austria: Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandels, 2019, pp. 71-80. ISBN 978-3-7089-1898-3; 978-3-903035-24-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v335.5
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2019
Conferința "Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days "
3, Budapesta, Ungaria, 2-3 mai 2019

Safeguards against electoral fraud vs. accessibility and citizens’ convenience – Neet for changes in the German electoral system

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v335.5
CZU: [324+342.8:004.75](430)

Pag. 71-80

Armbruster Evelyn, Pautsch Arne
 
Hochschule für Öffentliche Verwaltung und Finanzen
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 11 octombrie 2019


Rezumat

Democratic elections are the basis of democracy. Allegations of electoral fraud lead to protests and violent clashes all over the world. In order to avoid such scenes, the electoral system has to be reliable and transparent. At the same time, voter turnout must be kept high in order to maintain the will of the people in a representative way. However, the required accessibility and citizens’ convenience often seems to be in conflict with system security. Higher safeguards often comes with more formalisation and therefore less flexibility for the individual. This article shows how the German electoral system can be improved, while combining safety standards with citizens’ convenience. For this purpose, significant weaknesses of voting in polling stations, postal vote, the count of votes and digitalization, especially e-voting are identified. To remedy these weaknesses, solutions from various European democracies are presented as reform approaches for the German electoral system.

Cuvinte-cheie
electoral fraud, e-voting, postal vote, voting in polling stations, count of votes