Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
852 4 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2022-02-22 19:44 |
SM ISO690:2012 RACHIERU, Adrian Dinu. Resurecţia modernismului? Câteva precizări terminologice In: Metaliteratură, 2013, nr. 1-2(32), pp. 99-103. ISSN 1857-1905. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Metaliteratură | ||||||
Numărul 1-2(32) / 2013 / ISSN 1857-1905 | ||||||
|
||||||
Pag. 99-103 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
This study resumes a discussion on the meanings of the concepts: „modernism” and „modernity”. Indeed Adrian Marino noted that modernism includes (absorbs) and overcomes, by extension, the idea of modern. And this family of concepts, maintaining confusion, perpetuates - inevitably – an „abusive and explanatory” synonymy. We should note that there is a tendency of «eternal modernism”, including the sphere of a new idea (from the current to fashion) and, on the other hand, the concept in question constantly changes its contents, ending by denying itself, spraying itself into a „suite of modernisms”. Between these concepts there are many mutual relations and interferences, sparking a multitude of reactions so that, there is noted „modernizing pluralism” and, consequently, multiple, alternatives modernisms with different speeds etc., on the basis of a tendential modernism. There is also noted failed modernism. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie modern, modernism, postmodernism, multiple modernities, alternative modernisms, failed modernism. |
||||||
|