Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
662 6 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-05-23 15:14 |
SM ISO690:2012 DUMITRAŞ, Tudor. Dimensiuni istorico-metodologice ale fundamentării economiei politice
. In: Moldoscopie, 2011, nr. 1(52), pp. 20-36. ISSN 1812-2566. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Moldoscopie | |||||
Numărul 1(52) / 2011 / ISSN 1812-2566 /ISSNe 2587-4063 | |||||
|
|||||
Pag. 20-36 | |||||
|
|||||
Descarcă PDF | |||||
Rezumat | |||||
In the article is revealed the contribution of the English economist philosopher
John Stuart Mill in the elaboration of political economy methodology. Mill is a pioneer in this field, being one the first economists who consciously approach the necessity of the conciliation of philosophic methodology problem with the specification of economic knowledge. Manifesting himself as a philosopher and logician, the economist Mill, believes that the most successful method of knowledge of the political economy science is the a priori and a posteriori method, focusing the most on the a priori method as a theoretical deductive method. “A priori” at Mill is not identical with “a priori” at Kant. Mill’s method starts from several correct assumptions, which state obvious realities. The correct conclusions drawn by this assumption represent an abstract truth, but when they are filled out with facts not taken into account before, they become absolute and can be applied in practice. The obtained knowledge can be verified. The verification implies the reveling the theory of identity with the particular cases of the theoretical forecast with real effect. The appearance of the contradictions between “predicted results” and “the realized results” do not unfold the theory error, but the reflection one and the deficiency of the realized reasoning. The errors exclusion contributes to the designing of the economic laws essence as tendency. The determination of economic laws assigns political economy the status of science that makes it differ from art. |
|||||
|