Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
293 2 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-02-10 11:45 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
347.962.3:343.162 (2) |
Procedură legală. Personal judiciar şi organizare judiciară (946) |
Acțiune penală. Investigație penală. Procedură penală (1390) |
SM ISO690:2012 BALABAN, Sergiu. Asigurarea independenței judecătorului prin prisma principiului proporționalității în materia trageri la răspundere disciplinară a judecătorului. In: State, security and human rights: in digital era, 8-9 decembrie 2021, Chişinău. Chişinău: Centrul Editorial-Poligrafic al USM, 2022, pp. 83-89. ISBN 978-9975-159-32-6. 10.5281/zenodo.6393014 |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
State, security and human rights 2022 | ||||||
Conferința "Statul, securitatea şi drepturile omului în era digitală" Chişinău, Moldova, 8-9 decembrie 2021 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 347.962.3:343.162 | ||||||
Pag. 83-89 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The judiciary is one of the three powers in any democratic state. Its role is to ensure the very existence of the rule of law and to ensure the proper application of the law in an impartial, fair and efficient manner. In the current public space there are many discussions related to the extent of judges’ independence and their responsibility. For some, independence can only be effectively ensured if the judge is exempt from liability, and for others the purpose of the judge’s independence is to ensure that a correct decision is made, free from political or economic pressure. In the view of others, the judge cannot make an exception to the fundamental principle that no one can be exonerated from liability, because no one is above the law. But at the same time, the responsibility of the judge must be met in accordance with the criteria of the principle of proportionality in order to ensure the proper functioning of the entire judicial system. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie Ensuring judge`s independence through the principle of proportionality in the field of disciplinary liability of the judge |
||||||
|