The purpose of the present paper consists in the synthetization of the role of the judicial inspection body, as an element of judicial self-government, in ensuring the balance between transparency and confidentiality in the activity of Justice, in terms of its public presence and voice. How visible should the judicial inspection be in conditions of a transparent Justice? To the extent that people – professionals and non-professionals – know about its existence, its role and general operational aspects. How loud should the judicial inspection be? Loud enough: both for the public and for the Judiciary. Which would be the most appropriate means of public communication? It is at the discretion of judicial self-government. It is important this kind of communication to be a strategic one.