Detoxification of soils from pesticide residues is an important factor in the greening of the agro-industrial complex. Recently, these works have become especially relevant in connection with the adoption of Federal Law No. 280-FZ of 03.08.2018 ―On Organic Products and on Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation‖. Vegetation experiments on soil detoxification were carried out in accordance with the traditional method, according to which the sod-podzolic soil was treated with the herbicide Singer SP at a dose of 0.4 g/ha using a laboratory sprayer. A day later, AU samples were introduced at a dose of 100 kg / ha. After a day, the prepared soil was distributed into waxed disposable paper cups with a capacity of 600 g of soil and the test plants of rapeseed of the Ratnik variety were sown 3 pcs. For each vessel. The repetition of the experiment is 5 times for each dose of the studied AU samples. The cultivation of test plants was carried out under controlled conditions of the artificial climate laboratory (LIK) in the Fetch chambers (Germany). After 25 days, the aboveground mass of test plants was cut and weighed. The level of antidote effectiveness of the experimental samples of active coals was judged by the mass of the aboveground organs of the test plants in comparison with the control variant without herbicide and active coal. The decrease in the mass of test plants in the experimental variants relative to the control was calculated by the formula: B=100-(A/K * 100), %, where B is the decrease in the mass of test plants in the experimental variant relative to the untreated control; A – the average value of the mass of test plants on the experimental version; K – is the average value of the mass of test plants in the control variant. The data obtained are shown in table 1 Table 1 Test results for a comparative assessment of the antidote effectiveness of various brands of AU (LIK FGBNU VNIIF, Department of Herbology, 2021) n / a Variant Dose of AU, kg / ha Dose of herbicide Singer, SP, g / ha Aboveground mass of test plants, g Weight reduction of test plants, % to control by repetitions average 1 2 3 4 5 1 Agrosorb-SO 100 5,7 57 5,7 5,8 5,8 5,7 3,3 2 0,4 4,3 5,5 11,1 10,8 4,7 7,3 -23,7 3 Agrosorb-N 100 6,3 6,7 5,9 5,4 6,2 6,1 -3,4 4 0,4 7,1 6,8 5,8 10,7 6,3 7,3 -23,7 5 UPK-1B ( = 450 g/dm3) 100 4,3 3,8 4,1 4,6 4,7 4,3 27,1 6 0,4 7,6 4,2 4,3 4,1 5,4 5,1 13,6 7 VSK-830 act.2 100 6,7 6,4 7,5 7,2 8,0 7,2 -22,0 8 0,4 9,2 6,1 5,4 6,9 5,4 6,6 -11,9 Control (Singer) 0,4 5,3 4,2 3,1 3,6 4,1 30,5 Control without AU and herbicide - 5,5 5,0 5,7 7,2 5,9 0 Note: negative values – stimulation of plant growth. As follows from the data given in Table 1, the introduction of active coals into the soil contaminated with the herbicide makes it possible to neutralize its depressing effect on the test culture of rapeseed, while the best results were obtained by the active coals of Agrosorb-SO and VSK-830.