Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
379 2 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-06-13 12:03 |
SM ISO690:2012 GUȚU, Serghei, ROJNOVEANU, Gheorghe. Current inconsistencies in the reporting of cases of intraabdominal textile foreign bodies. In: Cercetarea în biomedicină și sănătate: calitate, excelență și performanță, Ed. 1, 20-22 octombrie 2021, Chişinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: 2021, p. 243. ISBN 978-9975-82-223-7 (PDF).. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Cercetarea în biomedicină și sănătate: calitate, excelență și performanță 2021 | |||||
Conferința "Cercetarea în biomedicină și sănătate: calitate, excelență și performanță" 1, Chişinău, Moldova, 20-22 octombrie 2021 | |||||
|
|||||
Pag. 243-243 | |||||
|
|||||
Descarcă PDF | |||||
Rezumat | |||||
Background. It is assumed that the incidence of textile foreign bodies (TFB) unintentionally left into abdominal cavity is underreported, mostly due to the legal implications of their detection. Objective of the study. Assessment of current realities regarding the reporting of TFB cases of abdominal cavity based on the anonymous survey among abdominal surgeons and obstetricians-gynecologists. Material and Methods. One hundred thirty-five responses were received to a specially developed anonymous questionnaire on the TFB problem, including medico-legal aspects. Of the total number of respondents, 81 were surgeons and 54 – gynecologists. Results. Over 80% of respondents consider that if TFB was removed from abdominal cavity during the surgical intervention, it should be indicated in the final diagnosis. At the same time, the fact of detecting and removing TFB retained in abdomen in the real cases known by respondents was reflected in the surgical report and in diagnosis in only 49.1%. False description in case of detection and removal of intra-abdominal TFB admits 29.6% from total number of respondents, but only 24.5% with a shorter length of work (<15 years), and 40.7% - with a work experience over 15 years. Conclusion. Surprisingly, about 20% of respondents consider it justified not to indicate retained TFB in the final diagnosis. Almost half of surgeons with a long lasting work experience allow a false description of intraoperative findings and the diagnosis. |
|||||
Cuvinte-cheie textile foreign body, surgical report, underreporting, corp străin textil, protocol operator, subraportare |
|||||
|