Aspecte privind modul de evaluare a bunăstării găinilor ouătoare crescute în baterii de cuşti îmbunătăţite
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
480 5
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-01-15 12:19
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
636.5.034.083 (1)
Păsări domestice (180)
SM ISO690:2012
ANDRONIE, Ioana, PÎRVU, Monica, ANDRONIE, V., ANGHELOAIA, V.. Aspecte privind modul de evaluare a bunăstării găinilor ouătoare crescute în baterii de cuşti îmbunătăţite. In: Medicină veterinară: Lucrări ştiinţifice, 3 octombrie 2014, Chişinău. Chişinău Republica Moldova: Centrul editorial UASM, 2014, Vol.40, pp. 86-88. ISBN 978-9975-64-263-7.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Medicină veterinară
Vol.40, 2014
Simpozionul "40 ani de învăţământ superior medical veterinar în Republica Moldova"
Chişinău, Moldova, 3 octombrie 2014

Aspecte privind modul de evaluare a bunăstării găinilor ouătoare crescute în baterii de cuşti îmbunătăţite

CZU: 636.5.034.083

Pag. 86-88

Andronie Ioana, Pîrvu Monica, Andronie V., Angheloaia V.
 
Universitatea „Spiru Haret”, Bucureşti
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 20 mai 2020


Rezumat

The purpose of this study was to assess the welfare of laying hens raised for egg consumption, starting from the health indicator defined by the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol correlated with the husbandry system. The research included laying hens (n: 200) raised in furnished cages, grouped in two lots, A and B. Following the indicator assessment – health condition by means of observation, examination and numerical appreciation of bodily areas of the birds included in the protocol, we noticed a higher incidence in skin lesions in lot A (52%) compared to lot B (26%), which was due to differences in provided housing surface; sternum health recorded a higher score in lot A (11 points) compared to lot B (8 points), values that were nonetheless non-defining correlated to the number of birds assessed and did not modify  the final result of this indicator overall. Assessment of painful management procedures indicated a lower score in lot A (3%) compared to lot B (29%). Pecking injuries recorded a high score in lot A compared to lot B, due to the higher housing density as well as to the behavioural characteristics of the hybrid individuals raised. Debeaking, skin and leg lesions, sternum and comb health, feathering quality, mortality and necessity slaughtering rates have indicated levels of welfare ranging from average to complete.

Cuvinte-cheie
assessment, Furnished cages, Laying hens, welfare