Opinie cu privire la impactul activității practico-științifice a judecătorului asupra actului de justiție înfăptuit
Закрыть
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
797 11
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-02-07 11:44
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
[343.16+347.962](478) (1)
Уголовное судопроизводство. Уголовно-процессуальное право (1372)
Гражданское процессуальное право. Судоустройство (918)
SM ISO690:2012
FURDUI, Sergiu. Opinie cu privire la impactul activității practico-științifice a judecătorului asupra actului de justiție înfăptuit. In: Revista Naţională de Drept, 2017, nr. 2(196), pp. 13-18. ISSN 1811-0770.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Revista Naţională de Drept
Numărul 2(196) / 2017 / ISSN 1811-0770 /ISSNe 2587-411X

Opinie cu privire la impactul activității practico-științifice a judecătorului asupra actului de justiție înfăptuit
CZU: [343.16+347.962](478)

Pag. 13-18

Furdui Sergiu
 
Curtea de Apel Chişinău
 
Disponibil în IBN: 28 februarie 2017


Rezumat

Activity on justice court under authority delegated by law, as a spear tip in the exercise of rule of law, is monitored and watched very carefully by the public and thus the scientific-practical activity, which is a part, is expressed most clearly and clear views on issues of law hearing the proceedings. Practical and scientific activity meets the various court actions, such as developing and publishing opinions on the problems faced by law, teaching activity – teachers, trainers at the National Institute of Justice, the preparation and presentation to conferences, seminars, symposiums, participation in working group drafting the law, decisions explanatory speeches in public debates on legal issues, etc. Without claiming to be relevant or achieve perfect degree, mention that not all actions that form the practical activity-scientific judge, either in terms of approach and motivation, or just below that of legality made solutions, are immune from criticism; their promotion is designed to foster the exchange of professional opinion affirming judge for training and as representative of the judiciary. In that article I presented an important direction of the judge to stage contemporary work on this line of thought, consider that some of the things that are done will find their solution in the near future, while others still may not be aware and therefore made, decision makers will stand out, because the concern of judges to materialize in concrete scientific-practical work and effective.

Cuvinte-cheie
scientific-practical activity, public debates,

law, justice, opinion