Sentința judecătorească – actul final al aprecierii probelor
Закрыть
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
454 16
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-09-27 15:44
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
343.13/.14 (8)
Уголовное судопроизводство. Уголовно-процессуальное право (1482)
SM ISO690:2012
LUPAŞCO, Lilia. Sentința judecătorească – actul final al aprecierii probelor . In: Infracţiunea – Răspunderea penală – Pedeapsa. Drept şi Criminologie, Ed. Ediția I-a, 25-26 martie 2021, Chişinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: Centrul Editorial-Poligrafic al USM, 2021, Ediția I-a, pp. 682-692. ISBN 978-9975-158-12-1.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Infracţiunea – Răspunderea penală – Pedeapsa. Drept şi Criminologie
Ediția I-a, 2021
Conferința "Infracţiunea – Răspunderea penală – Pedeapsa. Drept şi Criminologie", conferinţă ştiinţifică naţională"
Ediția I-a, Chişinău, Moldova, 25-26 martie 2021

Sentința judecătorească – actul final al aprecierii probelor

Verdict – final act regarding the assessment of the evidence

CZU: 343.13/.14

Pag. 682-692

Lupaşco Lilia
 
Universitatea de Stat din Moldova
 
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 24 iunie 2021


Rezumat

In the criminal procedural law of the Republic of Moldova, the court sentence is regulated in different contexts and with various names. The sentence is adopted in the name of the law. The adoption of the sentence in the name of the law increases the degree of authority of this act, as well as the responsibility of the judge in connection with the pronouncing of an unfounded decision. In this connection, it was mentioned that the sentence issued in the name of the law is, in fact, similar to the law in terms of obligation for the persons it concerns. The court sentence is the act of final synthesis of all the legal norms that were applied by the subjects of the criminal case in all the stages through which it passed. In these stages, the court forms its personal opinion with reference to all the evidence collected during the criminal case. Despite the fact that sometimes the judge’s point of view may differ from the opinion of the other members of the panel, the main task is for the evidence to be assessed objectively. In the sentence, the court will highlight the reasons that determined the admission or rejection of the evidence, administered by both the prosecution and the defense, having the obligation to assess the entire evidence.

Cuvinte-cheie
criminal trial, assessment of evidence, commissioning, judicial investigation, preliminary hearing, sentence

Dublin Core Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:oai_dc='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd'>
<dc:creator>Lupaşco, L.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2021</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang='en'><p>In the criminal procedural law of the Republic of Moldova, the court sentence is regulated in different contexts and with various names. The sentence is adopted in the name of the law. The adoption of the sentence in the name of the law increases the degree of authority of this act, as well as the responsibility of the judge in connection with the pronouncing of an unfounded decision. In this connection, it was mentioned that the sentence issued in the name of the law is, in fact, similar to the law in terms of obligation for the persons it concerns. The court sentence is the act of final synthesis of all the legal norms that were applied by the subjects of the criminal case in all the stages through which it passed. In these stages, the court forms its personal opinion with reference to all the evidence collected during the criminal case. Despite the fact that sometimes the judge&rsquo;s point of view may differ from the opinion of the other members of the panel, the main task is for the evidence to be assessed objectively. In the sentence, the court will highlight the reasons that determined the admission or rejection of the evidence, administered by both the prosecution and the defense, having the obligation to assess the entire evidence.</p></dc:description>
<dc:source>Infracţiunea – Răspunderea penală – Pedeapsa. Drept şi Criminologie (Ediția I-a) 682-692</dc:source>
<dc:subject>criminal trial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>assessment of evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>commissioning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>judicial investigation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>preliminary hearing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>sentence</dc:subject>
<dc:title>Sentința judecătorească &ndash; actul final al aprecierii probelor </dc:title>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>