| Articolul precedent |
| Articolul urmator |
 |
 450 16 |
| Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-09-27 15:44 |
| Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
| 343.13/.14 (8) |
| Уголовное судопроизводство. Уголовно-процессуальное право (1482) |
 SM ISO690:2012LUPAŞCO, Lilia. Sentința judecătorească – actul final al aprecierii probelor . In: Infracţiunea – Răspunderea penală – Pedeapsa. Drept şi Criminologie, Ed. Ediția I-a, 25-26 martie 2021, Chişinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: Centrul Editorial-Poligrafic al USM, 2021, Ediția I-a, pp. 682-692. ISBN 978-9975-158-12-1. |
| EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
| Infracţiunea – Răspunderea penală – Pedeapsa. Drept şi Criminologie Ediția I-a, 2021 |
||||||||
|
Conferința "Infracţiunea – Răspunderea penală – Pedeapsa. Drept şi Criminologie", conferinţă ştiinţifică naţională" Ediția I-a, Chişinău, Moldova, 25-26 martie 2021 | ||||||||
|
||||||||
| CZU: 343.13/.14 | ||||||||
| Pag. 682-692 | ||||||||
|
||||||||
 Descarcă PDF |
||||||||
| Rezumat | ||||||||
In the criminal procedural law of the Republic of Moldova, the court sentence is regulated in different contexts and with various names. The sentence is adopted in the name of the law. The adoption of the sentence in the name of the law increases the degree of authority of this act, as well as the responsibility of the judge in connection with the pronouncing of an unfounded decision. In this connection, it was mentioned that the sentence issued in the name of the law is, in fact, similar to the law in terms of obligation for the persons it concerns. The court sentence is the act of final synthesis of all the legal norms that were applied by the subjects of the criminal case in all the stages through which it passed. In these stages, the court forms its personal opinion with reference to all the evidence collected during the criminal case. Despite the fact that sometimes the judge’s point of view may differ from the opinion of the other members of the panel, the main task is for the evidence to be assessed objectively. In the sentence, the court will highlight the reasons that determined the admission or rejection of the evidence, administered by both the prosecution and the defense, having the obligation to assess the entire evidence. |
||||||||
| Cuvinte-cheie criminal trial, assessment of evidence, commissioning, judicial investigation, preliminary hearing, sentence |
||||||||
|
Crossref XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <doi_batch version='4.3.7' xmlns='http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.7' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.7 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref4.3.7.xsd'> <head> <doi_batch_id>ibn-133688</doi_batch_id> <timestamp>1733792385</timestamp> <depositor> <depositor_name>Information Society Development Instiute, Republic of Moldova</depositor_name> <email_address>[email protected]</email_address> </depositor> </head> <body> <collection> <collection_metadata> <full_title>Infracţiunea – Răspunderea penală – Pedeapsa. Drept şi Criminologie</full_title> </collection_metadata> <collection_issue> <publication_date media_type='print'> <year>2021</year> </publication_date> </collection_issue> <collection_article publication_type='full_text'><titles> <title>Sentința judecătorească – actul final al aprecierii probelor </title> </titles> <contributors> <person_name sequence='first' contributor_role='author'> <given_name>Lilia</given_name> <surname>Lupaşco</surname> </person_name> </contributors> <publication_date media_type='print'> <year>2021</year> </publication_date> <pages> <first_page>682</first_page> <last_page>692</last_page> </pages> </collection_article> </collection> </body> </doi_batch>
|
|
|
