On political correctness in american society
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
436 0
SM ISO690:2012
VARZARI, Elena. On political correctness in american society. In: Tradiţie şi modernitate în abordarea limbajului: Materialele colocviului comemorativ international consacrat aniversării a 65-a de la naşterea profesorului Mircea Ioniţă, 25 noiembrie 2006, Bălţi. Bălţi: Universitatea de Stat „Alecu Russo" din Bălţi, 2006, p. 134. ISBN 978-9975-50-014-2 .
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Tradiţie şi modernitate în abordarea limbajului 2006
Colocviul "Tradiţie şi modernitate în abordarea limbajului"
Bălţi, Moldova, 25 noiembrie 2006

On political correctness in american society


Pag. 134-134

Varzari Elena
 
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 23 martie 2020


Rezumat

The article "On Political Correctness in American Society» aims at highlighting several issues of Political Correctness, which will help to enhance English teachers’ awareness, and provide some information to be shared with students. Teachers of English will be able to explain their students how language is changing, and give tem guidance on how to use various terms appropriately. In the last decade Political Correctness has become an important topic in American intellectual life. PC debate has spread into newsrooms, movie studios, and even the halls of Congress Critics, mainly on the right, claim that only the "correct" views on these and other sensitive issues can be expressed without evoking extreme, stifling reactions from activists seeking to make their opinions into an enforced orthodoxy. Some of the following questions will be discussed in the article: What is Political Correctness? Which is its impact on Modern American Society? Are speakers treated respectfully regardless of the popularity of their views? Are some opinions given privileged access to the media? Are people sincere in their arguments? Who can talk about what topics, and when, without violating some unspoken canon of decency? Do advocates of one position seek to prevent, or discredit, the expression of opposing ideas? Do some arguments so offend the sensibilities of some citizens that they should be preemptively excluded from public debate?, etc.