| Articolul precedent |
| Articolul urmator |
 |
 670 8 |
| Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2022-03-19 10:40 |
 SM ISO690:2012CEHAN, Anca. Defining ‘method’ in the post-method era. In: Professional Development in Language Contexts: Perceptions and Practices, Ed. 5, 15-16 martie 2019, Bălți. Bălți, Republica Moldova: Universitatea de Stat „Alecu Russo" din Bălţi, 2019, pp. 31-40. ISBN 978-9975-3316-2-3. |
| EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
| Professional Development in Language Contexts: Perceptions and Practices 2019 | ||||||||
|
Simpozionul "Professional Development in Language Contexts: Perceptions and Practices" 5, Bălți, Moldova, 15-16 martie 2019 | ||||||||
|
||||||||
| Pag. 31-40 | ||||||||
|
||||||||
 Descarcă PDF |
||||||||
| Rezumat | ||||||||
The paper aims to raise the English teachers’ awareness of the terminological ambiguities and the loose use of several common TEFL words such as “method”, “approach”, “design”, “technique”, “procedure”, “strategy”, “methodology”, and others. The efforts that have been made in an attempt to clarify them are presented in connection with the models proposed by E. M. Antony (1963), W. F. Mackey (1965), J. C. Richards and T. S. Rodgers (1982), H. H. Stern (1983), and B. Kumaravadivelu (2008). The ambiguities and overlaps found in these models are pointed out, and implications for the practitioners’ condition are suggested. |
||||||||
| Cuvinte-cheie Method, approach, design, technique, strategy, methodology |
||||||||
|
Cerif XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <CERIF xmlns='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1' xsi:schemaLocation='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1 http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF-1.5/CERIF_1.5_1.xsd' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' release='1.5' date='2012-10-07' sourceDatabase='Output Profile'> <cfResPubl> <cfResPublId>ibn-ResPubl-98777</cfResPublId> <cfResPublDate>2019</cfResPublDate> <cfStartPage>31</cfStartPage> <cfISBN>978-9975-3316-2-3</cfISBN> <cfURI>https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/vizualizare_articol/98777</cfURI> <cfTitle cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'>Defining ‘method’ in the post-method era</cfTitle> <cfKeyw cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'>Method; approach; design; technique; strategy; methodology</cfKeyw> <cfAbstr cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'><p>The paper aims to raise the English teachers’ awareness of the terminological ambiguities and the loose use of several common TEFL words such as “method”, “approach”, “design”, “technique”, “procedure”, “strategy”, “methodology”, and others. The efforts that have been made in an attempt to clarify them are presented in connection with the models proposed by E. M. Antony (1963), W. F. Mackey (1965), J. C. Richards and T. S. Rodgers (1982), H. H. Stern (1983), and B. Kumaravadivelu (2008). The ambiguities and overlaps found in these models are pointed out, and implications for the practitioners’ condition are suggested.</p></cfAbstr> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>eda2d9e9-34c5-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>759af938-34ae-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2019T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>e601872f-4b7e-4d88-929f-7df027b226c9</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>40e90e2f-446d-460a-98e5-5dce57550c48</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2019T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfPers_ResPubl> <cfPersId>ibn-person-73767</cfPersId> <cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2019T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfPers_ResPubl> </cfResPubl> <cfPers> <cfPersId>ibn-Pers-73767</cfPersId> <cfPersName_Pers> <cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-73767-3</cfPersNameId> <cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2019T24:00:00</cfStartDate> <cfFamilyNames>Cehan</cfFamilyNames> <cfFirstNames>Anca</cfFirstNames> </cfPersName_Pers> </cfPers> </CERIF>
|
|
|
