A comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: A preliminary study in clinical practice
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
679 0
SM ISO690:2012
GARIUC , Lucia, , , , , , , BELLUSSI, Luisa Maria, DAMIANI, Valerio, CIPRANDI, Giorgio. A comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: A preliminary study in clinical practice. In: Acta Biomedica, 2020, vol. 91, pp. 65-72. ISSN 0392-4203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1-S.9229
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Acta Biomedica
Volumul 91 / 2020 / ISSN 0392-4203

A comparison between mometasone furoate nasal spray and intranasal glycyrrhetic acid in patients with allergic rhinitis: A preliminary study in clinical practice

DOI:https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1-S.9229

Pag. 65-72

Gariuc Lucia1, 1, 1, 2, Bellussi Luisa Maria2, Damiani Valerio3, Ciprandi Giorgio4
 
1 Timofei Moșneaga Republican Clinical Hospital,
2 Universita' Degli Studi di Siena,
3 DMG Medical Department, Pomezia,
4 Casa di Cura Villa Montallegro, Genoa
 
Proiecte:
 
Disponibil în IBN: 9 martie 2020


Rezumat

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is caused by an IgE-mediated inflammatory reaction consequent to the exposure to the causal allergen. Glycyrrhetic acid (GlyAc) is a natural compound extracted from the liquorice that exerts anti-inflammatory activity. This real-life study compared intranasal GlyAc, present in a medical device containing also glycerol and mannitol, with mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in 50 adult outpatients with AR. Both treatments lasted 2 months. Endoscopic signs, perception of symptom severity, assessed by VAS, and nasal function measured by rhinomanometry were evaluated at baseline (T0), after one (T1) and two (T2) months. The intergroup analysis showed that at T1 there was no significant difference between groups about the use of decongestants and antihistamines, turbinate hypertrophy and pale mucosa, perception of olfaction and snoring. At T2 there was no significant difference between groups about use of relievers, all endoscopic signs, and perception of nasal discomfort, nasal obstruction, olfaction, and snoring. The intragroup analysis showed that in MFNS group there was a significant change during the entire period of treatment for all parameters except watery rhinorrhea (sign) and ocular discomfort; in GlyAc group there was a significant change during the entire period of treatment for all parameters. In conclusion, this preliminary study, conducted in clinical practice, evidenced that intranasal CysAC plus mannitol was able to significantly improve nasal endoscopic signs, perception of symptoms, and nasal function in patients with AR. Therefore, GlyAc could be a reasonable therapeutic option to control allergic inflammation. (www.actabiomedica.it). 

Cuvinte-cheie
allergic rhinitis, Clinical practice, Glycyrrhetic acid, Mannitol, Mometasone furoate, Topical treatment