Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
569 1 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2021-05-31 16:00 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
347.77 (665) |
Drept comercial. Dreptul societăţilor comerciale (1285) |
SM ISO690:2012 UTKINA, Maryna. Research of know-howas possible object in the intellectual property objects system:comparison with foreign countries.. In: Legea şi Viaţa, 2019, nr. 9/2(333), pp. 147-150. ISSN 2587-4365. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Legea şi Viaţa | |||||
Numărul 9/2(333) / 2019 / ISSN 2587-4365 /ISSNe 2587-4373 | |||||
|
|||||
CZU: 347.77 | |||||
Pag. 147-150 | |||||
|
|||||
Descarcă PDF | |||||
Rezumat | |||||
Creative and intellectual activity is one of the most important life aspects and life forms for each person. The object of intellectual property is the result of such aforementioned activity, for example the implementation of a certain idea in life, and thus the acquisition of an objective form. At this stage of rapid and dynamic development of science, the number of intellectual property objects is steadily increasing, which, in turn, makes it impossible to establish a clear list of intellectual property objects at the legislative level. One of the problematic and pressing issues is know-how belonging, or vice versa, the non-attribution of it to the system of intellectual property rights objects. This issue arises also because there is no unity in defining the above category, its essence, legal nature, mechanism of protection and protection of the right to know-how. Abovementioned issues make the research relevant for determining the place of know-how in the system of intellectual property objects. While writing the scientific article, it was analyzed the place of know-how in the system of intellectual property rights objects in view of the scientific opinions pluralism regarding the interpretation of the very definition of “know-how”. In the context of European integration processes, it is also important to research the positions of the foreign community representatives regarding the possibility of assigning know-how to the intellectual property objects system. However, it was found that the problem of securing the above-mentioned definition at the legislative level exists not only in Ukraine but also in most countries of the world. In view of this, it was found that this category does not have an exact legal substantive content that would be outside the provisions of the normative act. |
|||||
Cuvinte-cheie know-how, intellectual property, object, result of intellectual activity, trade secret, ноу-хау, интеллектуальная собственность, объект, результат интеллектуальной собственности, коммерческая тайна |
|||||
|