This article is a presentation of a three syntheses that reveal substantial ways to think and write of the Romanian literature’s history. The literary critics and historians like Andrei Terian, Ion Simuţ and Cornel Ungureanu who show a beginning to the Western dialogue on this issue, invoking the need to rewrite the Romanian literature’s history by applying other criteria than the one that dictated the post-war canon of "the aesthetic autonomy". The political, geographic, geopolitical criterias are capable, as well as the aesthetic ones, of highlighting the relevant aspects of the literary phenomenon’s evolution from a given epoch.