The author research a case study analyzing in context of national law and the doctrins law - cases of the Constitutional Court examining several aspects of the judge’s remuneration, including the term of activity, the pension and the salary, as well as the calculated allowances. We note that these issues, with reference to the constitutional judge who decides on subjects that concern him, also leads to the emergence of a conflict of interest. The Constitutional Court, which did not react and did not recognize the presence of the conflict of interests, has been informed by the constitutional judges about decisions that concern themselves. The considerations deduced from the research allow the author to argue the thesis of the presence of a conflict of interest in the examination of this case and the similar cases, and it is necessary to properly regulate such situations and to carry out a genuine constitutional justice that would avoid conflicts of interest; would be the responsibility of the constitutional judge, to give an example to all Moldovan courts for the defense and safeguarding of human rights.