Dimitrie Cantemir-muzicianul în exegezele literaturii francofone din secolele XVIII–XIX
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
811 13
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2023-01-25 23:15
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
94(478):78.03"XVIII-XIX"CantemirD. (1)
Istoria Moldovei. Republica Moldova (67)
Istoria Americii de Nord. Americii Centrale (5918)
SM ISO690:2012
GHILAŞ, Victor. Dimitrie Cantemir-muzicianul în exegezele literaturii francofone din secolele XVIII–XIX. In: Istorie şi cultură, 20 noiembrie 2018, Chișinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: Institutul de Istorie, 2018, pp. 164-174. ISBN 978-9975-3283-6-4.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Istorie şi cultură 2018
Conferința "Istorie şi cultură "
Chișinău, Moldova, 20 noiembrie 2018

Dimitrie Cantemir-muzicianul în exegezele literaturii francofone din secolele XVIII–XIX

CZU: 94(478):78.03"XVIII-XIX"CantemirD.

Pag. 164-174

Ghilaş Victor
 
Institutul Patrimoniului Cultural
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 1 aprilie 2019


Rezumat

Dimitrie Cantemir’s musical concerns have come into the attention of specialized literature since the XVIII century. Although the German language sources were the most important in promoting the image of the musician in this period, pages by local and foreign authors, dedicated to the artistic personality of the Romanian scholar, have also been included into some Parisian editions (Ch. Fonton, I. de Mouradja d’Ohsson). However, in the following century, the situation has clearly changed in favour of literary sources of French expression. The XIX century accounts are offered in lexicographical, musicological, historical works and memoirs signed by musicologists (A. É. Choron, Fr.-J.-M. Fayolle), composers, music critics (Fr. J. Fétis, A. Soubies), painters and architects (A.L. Castellan), musicographers and orientalists (Al. de Nuoal-Lahoussaye, G. A. Villoteau), particularly from France and Belgium. In the approaches of the above-mentioned authors, Cantemir’s name appears as theorist, inventor of Turkish music notation system, composer, tanbur performer. The degree of novelty and the density of the informational support provided by these sources varies from case to case, two of them are highlighted in particular: (a) the one due to Fr. J. Fétis through which the author announces the fate of the second treatise on music by D. Cantemir, An Introduction to Turkish Music (Introducere în muzica turcească), whose manuscript might be in Astrakhan, and (b) the one reported by A. Soubies, in which Cantemir’s activity is related to his contribution to religious music and to the deepening of old Slavic idioms -the language of the singing in the Eastern ecclesial cult, which is still being used in the liturgical environment of Slavic Orthodoxy. Looking through the exegeses of the musical activity undertaken by Cantemir, transposed in the light of the Francophone specialized literature of the XIX century, one can find that a large part of them has disseminated the image of a wellknown personality, closely attached to the Oriental sound theory and practice, which secured the musician’s visibility, credibility, prestige and, at the same time, European and worldwide recognition.

Cuvinte-cheie
Dimitrie Cantemir, Francophonie, musician, Oriental music