Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
511 4 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2021-05-28 14:40 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
538.9+544.6 (8) |
Fizica materiei condensate. Fizica solidului (349) |
Electrochimie (115) |
SM ISO690:2012 BARANOV, Serghei Alexei. The modern electrochemical nucleation theory. In: Materials Science and Condensed Matter Physics, Ed. 9, 25-28 septembrie 2018, Chișinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: Institutul de Fizică Aplicată, 2018, Ediția 9, p. 223. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Materials Science and Condensed Matter Physics Ediția 9, 2018 |
|||||||
Conferința "International Conference on Materials Science and Condensed Matter Physics" 9, Chișinău, Moldova, 25-28 septembrie 2018 | |||||||
|
|||||||
CZU: 538.9+544.6 | |||||||
Pag. 223-223 | |||||||
|
|||||||
Descarcă PDF | |||||||
Rezumat | |||||||
Nucleation is usually described in the framework of the classical Gibbs theory of nucleation, which provides a simple expression for the critical radius of a growing nucleus (nanoparticles) [1]: rc ~ γ/μ, (1) where: γ is the specific surface energy, μ is the change in volume energy. The Ginsburg–Landau– Cahn–Baranov theory uses this equation [2, 3, 4]: θ″ (ρ) + ((L – 1)/ ρ) θ′(ρ) – F[(a, ρ),cos{θ(ρ)}, sin{θ(ρ)}] = 0, (2) where : L determines the space dimensionality of spinor, and F[(a, ρ),cos{θ(ρ)}, sin{θ(ρ)}] is a polynomial (analytical function) that can be defined in each case. Application of Eq. (2) to a 2D problem was thoroughly considered in [2, 4]. Below, we consider a 1D case (L = 1), which corresponds to the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theory [3]. The resulting equation has the form θ″ (ρ) = (a/2)sin{2θ(ρ)} , (3) which is similar to previously reported equations and according to which it is possible to obtain the solution [3]: cos{θ(ρ)} = -th{ aρ)} , (4) The size of the domain wall is an important parameter determining the nucleating seed size: rc ~ (K/μ)1/2 (5) Assuming that the domain wall size determines the critical radius of a nanoparticle, difference between Eqs. (1) and (5) should be noted. The simplest assumption regarding the relationship between the surface tension and the nanoparticle radius can be expressed as follows: γeff ~ γ/rrel , rrel ~ rc /Δin (6) where Δin is the thickness of the surface layer of the nanoparticle. If rrel < 1, then the Gibbs theory is not applicable. However, it can be applied in accordance with the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theory. In this case, a formula similar to (1) can be written as follows: rc ~ γeff / μ ~ Δinγ / rc μ, (K ~ Δinγ), (7) Thus, there is a correspondence between the Ginsburg–Landau–Cahn (see Eq. (5)) and Gibbs (see Eq. (1)) theories. We will examine the nucleation of cylindrical particle (L=2). We examine nonlinear equation [2, 4]: θ″ (ρ) + θ′(ρ)/ ρ – [a/ρ]² sin (θ(ρ)) cos (θ(ρ)) = 0. (8) The solution (8) is [2, 4]: tg {θ/2} = 1/ ρª. (9) This solution is termed the two-dimensional soliton (instanton) and is a rare example of the exact analytic solution of the nonlinear problem. |
|||||||
|