Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
689 19 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-04-10 15:02 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
340.6 (170) |
Științe auxiliare ale dreptului. Psihologie legală . Chimie legală. Medicină legală (167) |
SM ISO690:2012 CATARAGA, Olga. „Opinii privind problematica acreditării laboratoarelor de expertiză judiciară”. In: Revista ştiinţifico-practică ”Info-Med” , 2017, nr. 1(29), pp. 6-10. ISSN 1810-3936. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Revista ştiinţifico-practică ”Info-Med” | ||||||
Numărul 1(29) / 2017 / ISSN 1810-3936 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 340.6 | ||||||
Pag. 6-10 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The article analyzes the approach of some judicial actors on the process of judicial expertise laboratories accreditation in the country. Explanations are made on the term “accreditation”, with a retrospective of the accreditation process of the first laboratories of its kind in the world. Conceptual issues are explored on the quality of forensic expertise. The author explains the true destination standards quality and guides. Particular attention is drawn to the importance of accreditation for thejudicial expertise laboratories and their development. Laboratories improve their legal expertise and enhance the quality of their products (results).” |
||||||
|