Generalităţi privind alternativele privaţiunii de libertate
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
778 13
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-01-31 22:01
SM ISO690:2012
SPOIALA, Alexandru. Generalităţi privind alternativele privaţiunii de libertate . In: Anale ştiinţifice ale Academiei „Ştefan cel Mare” a MAI al RM: ştiinţe juridice, 2006, nr. VI, pp. 236-240. ISSN 1857-0976.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Anale ştiinţifice ale Academiei „Ştefan cel Mare” a MAI al RM: ştiinţe juridice
Numărul VI / 2006 / ISSN 1857-0976

Generalităţi privind alternativele privaţiunii de libertate

Pag. 236-240

Spoiala Alexandru
 
Academia „Ştefan cel Mare“ a MAI al Republicii Moldova
 
Disponibil în IBN: 2 decembrie 2013


Rezumat

Socio-economic and political changes have affected sanction systems and their implementation ever since modern criminal law has emerged as a central element of the modern state in the middle ages. The transition from the ubiquitous use of corporal punishment and the death penalty to the modern prison and the transition from prison as the regular approach to punishment to alternatives like the fine, probation, suspended sentence and other types of intermediate penalties replacing immediate physical control through supervision and various types of non-custodial control, and most recently the attempts to shift the focus from punishment to mediation and reparation demonstrates the enormous changes sanction systems and underlying philosophies have undergone so far in history and points towards the potential for change actually available for criminal law reform. The arguments for non-custodial sanctions are essentially the mirror image of the arguments against imprisonment. First, they are considered more appropriate for certain types of offences and offenders. Second, because they avoid ‘prisonisation’, they promote integration back into the community as well as rehabilitation, and therefore are more humane. Third, they are generally less costly than sanctions involving imprisonment. Fourth, by decreasing the prison population, they ease prison overcrowding and thus facilitate administration of prisons and the proper correctional treatment of those who remain in prison.