Today, the quality and efficiency of justice depends substantially of the liability of judges and also of the recognized and guaranteed immunity of judges. Immunity is seen as necessary to promote and preserve judicial independence as a foundational value of a State based on the rule of law. However, judicial immunity is not abslute and it should not be treated as an insuperable barrier. Law don’t absolves of liability on these representatives of the government, but established more complicated procedures for this purpose. Under the legislation, judges may be subject to criminal, administrative and disciplinary liability. This is justified by the fact that judicial immunity is not a personal privilege of the citizen employed as a judge, but a means of legal protection of its professional activity, means of protection of public interests and, above all, the interests of justice.