Peculiarities of taxation of producers of sugar beet in Ukraine
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
703 1
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2018-03-01 14:30
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
336.226.4:334.72:633.63(477) (1)
Venituri publice (469)
Forme de organizare și cooperare în activitatea economică (968)
Plante de zahăr și de amidon (49)
SM ISO690:2012
VARCHENKO, Olga, ARTIMONOVA, Iryna. Peculiarities of taxation of producers of sugar beet in Ukraine. In: The Scientific Journal of Cahul State University “Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu” Economic and Engineering Studies, 2017, nr. 1(1), pp. 41-50. ISSN 2587-313X.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
The Scientific Journal of Cahul State University “Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu” Economic and Engineering Studies
Numărul 1(1) / 2017 / ISSN 2587-313X /ISSNe 2587-3121

Peculiarities of taxation of producers of sugar beet in Ukraine

CZU: 336.226.4:334.72:633.63(477)
JEL: H21,H25

Pag. 41-50

Varchenko Olga, Artimonova Iryna
 
Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University
 
Disponibil în IBN: 26 februarie 2018


Rezumat

The article shows the dynamics of sales of sugar beet farms, determines the reasons of their production decline, in particular, high labor costs, primitive technology of this culture and prejudice of sugar processing enterprises to owners of private farms. A generalized private farms’ sales structure of sugar beet is considered.It is determined the price difference for individual products and agricultural enterprises, which is explained the different approaches to VAT. Thus, the producers, that are legally subject to VAT, actually spending the same money on the production and sale of sugar beet, receive much more income because of the difference between "output" and "input" of VAT. The current system of taxation of private farms in the sale of agricultural products is analyzed. Effective measures of state regulation of production and sale of sugar beet households in terms of a price risk are proposed.

Cuvinte-cheie
private farms, taxation, pricing, sugar beets, VAT,

processing plants, raw sugar,

cost.

Cerif XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<CERIF xmlns='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1' xsi:schemaLocation='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1 http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF-1.5/CERIF_1.5_1.xsd' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' release='1.5' date='2012-10-07' sourceDatabase='Output Profile'>
<cfResPubl>
<cfResPublId>ibn-ResPubl-59561</cfResPublId>
<cfResPublDate>2017-07-01</cfResPublDate>
<cfVol>1</cfVol>
<cfIssue>1</cfIssue>
<cfStartPage>41</cfStartPage>
<cfISSN>2587-313X</cfISSN>
<cfURI>https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/vizualizare_articol/59561</cfURI>
<cfTitle cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'>Peculiarities of taxation of producers of sugar beet in Ukraine</cfTitle>
<cfKeyw cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'>private farms; processing plants; taxation; pricing; sugar beets; raw sugar; VAT; cost.</cfKeyw>
<cfAbstr cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'><p><em>The article shows the dynamics of sales of sugar beet farms, determines the reasons of their production decline, in particular, high labor costs, primitive technology of this culture and prejudice of sugar processing enterprises to owners of private farms. A generalized private farms&rsquo; sales structure of sugar beet is considered.It is determined the price difference for individual products and agricultural enterprises, which is explained the different approaches to VAT. Thus, the producers, that are legally subject to VAT, actually spending the same money on the production and sale of sugar beet, receive much more income because of the difference between &quot;output&quot; and &quot;input&quot; of VAT. The current system of taxation of private farms in the sale of agricultural products is analyzed. Effective measures of state regulation of production and sale of sugar beet households in terms of a price risk are proposed.</em></p></cfAbstr>
<cfResPubl_Class>
<cfClassId>eda2d9e9-34c5-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>759af938-34ae-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2017-07-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfResPubl_Class>
<cfResPubl_Class>
<cfClassId>e601872f-4b7e-4d88-929f-7df027b226c9</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>40e90e2f-446d-460a-98e5-5dce57550c48</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2017-07-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfResPubl_Class>
<cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfPersId>ibn-person-47734</cfPersId>
<cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2017-07-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfPersId>ibn-person-52572</cfPersId>
<cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2017-07-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfPers_ResPubl>
</cfResPubl>
<cfPers>
<cfPersId>ibn-Pers-47734</cfPersId>
<cfPersName_Pers>
<cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-47734-3</cfPersNameId>
<cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2017-07-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
<cfFamilyNames>Varchenko</cfFamilyNames>
<cfFirstNames>Olga</cfFirstNames>
<cfFamilyNames>Варченко</cfFamilyNames>
<cfFirstNames>O.</cfFirstNames>
</cfPersName_Pers>
</cfPers>
<cfPers>
<cfPersId>ibn-Pers-52572</cfPersId>
<cfPersName_Pers>
<cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-52572-3</cfPersNameId>
<cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2017-07-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
<cfFamilyNames>Artimonova</cfFamilyNames>
<cfFirstNames>Iryna</cfFirstNames>
</cfPersName_Pers>
</cfPers>
</CERIF>