В статье привлекается внимание к проблеме гарантирования права человека на достойную смерть и обеспечение реализации его волеизъявления о надлежащем отношении к нему после смерти. Обосновывается, что гарантирование права человека на достойную смерть, прежде всего, cвязано с обеспечением его уходом, медицинской помощью современного уровня с использованием возможностей паллиативной медицины, с надлежащей процедурой его захоронения, а также строгим соблюдением условий его завещания. Выявлены проблемы правового и организационного характера, обусловливающие соответствующие нарушения участниками этих отношений на этапе установления факта смерти, получения справки о смерти и разрешения на выдачу трупа, захоронения умершего, выполнения условий его завещания. Раскрыты проблемные аспекты правоотношений, связанных с патологоанатомическим вскрытием трупов и изъятием донорских органов. Внесены предложения, направленные на совершенствование законодательства, касающегося указанных проблем.

The article takes notice to such most critical constituents of problem of observance of human rights, related to death, as a problem of guaranteeing of their right on death with dignity and on providing of realization of their will about the proper attitude toward a body after death. Also the article settles that guaranteeing of human right on death with dignity is above all things related to providing tendance and medicare of modern level with the use of possibilities of palliative medicine. As for propaganda of euthanasia, it is predefined not so much by an anxiety about providing of human right on death with dignity, as by enhancement transplantation of organs and tela, commercialization of medical services and necessity, for this purpose, in donor organs. Found out the problems of legal and organizational character, which cause the proper violations by participants of these relations on the stage of establishment of fact of death of man, receipt of certificate about death and permission of prosecutor on delivery of dead body. In particular, in the absence of stage of prejudicial examination of statements and reports about criminal offences, according to which in most cases after the first consequence actions are closed for lack of crime components. And it gives the large superfluously job for ivestigative subsections and experts, expense of money for these necessities and curvature of statistical information about offence. The article notices the problem of providing of ministry of internal affairs staff the help by specialists (doctors) on the stage of establishment of reasons of death. The problem aspects of legal relationships, related to the pathoanatomical section and the exception of donor organs are also exposed. Notices the lacks of the legal adjusting of receipt of will of person in relation to attitude toward it’s body after death, organizations of procedure of it’s realization and absence of control after it’s implementation. There are some examples of consequences of criminal commercialization of relations, related to the burial place and funeral business. Found out the lacks of prosecutor’s supersvision after the observance of human rights in these legal relationships.