The word “humanism” is maintaining. The super-humanism leaves its place to transhumanism with its augmented man (superman). We prefer with Joël de Rosnay (2016) the hyper-humanism. Its usage is justified for the work of Jacques Demorgon because it was built during four decades on the terrain of European meetings (Élysée Treaty, 1963): actions, formations and researches in the middle of the crisis of youth (Intercultural exploration. For an international Pedagogy, 1989 / L’exploration interculturelle. Pour une pédagogie internationale, 1989). The Europe is the consciousness of cultures: its own and those of immigrated people. From where a book of methodology results for studying and understanding the cultures except the prejudices and stereotypes (Complexity of cultures and the intercultural. Against the unique thoughts. / Complexité des cultures et de l’interculturel. Contre les pensées uniques, 1996 ; 5e éd. 2016). It is related to the history, to understand the resistance of cultures without denying their creating interaction. Three new books. On the depth of the past: The intercultural history of societies. For an information world / L’histoire interculturelle des sociétés. Pour une information monde, 1998, 2e éd. 2002. On the relational difficulties: Guide of the intercultural in formation. / Guide de l’interculturel en formation, 1999. On the genesis of the cultures in course: The interculturation of the world / L’interculturation du monde, 2000. The Europe rallying the neoliberal unique thought began to think that the economic and technical-scientific modernity could create the unity of its people without worrying the cultures. In these conditions, an intercultural dialogue of free will is sufficient. Criticism of the intercultural / Critique de l’interculturel (2005) shows that the intercultural (contacts and dialogues) should articulate as well with multi-cultural and multi-culturalism (differences and tolerances) leading to trans-cultural of reciprocal transformation. According to each singular situation. Failing the inhuman / Déjouer l’inhumain (2010) in the continuity of Edgar Morin, sketches, sketches a profound antagonistic systemic of cultures. the true meaning of the intercultural dialogue results from its relational dynamism: consensus and dissensus. Thus, neither the unity nor the diversity of the human are not compromised. The antagonistic man / L’homme antagoniste (2016) discover, from China in Greece till Lupasco, the antagonism at the heart of the universe. In order to see them better at the source of the species homo with the anthropology of neoteny. Giving the possibility to the means to reach to the conversion of human tragedies. Transposing to their specific situations, the methods make the antagonisms to become builders while they produce the techno-scientific miracles.