Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
1238 5 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-03-27 07:06 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
37.0(569.4) (2) |
Educație (14210) |
SM ISO690:2012 SAIF, Sondos. Educational system in Israel – grouping and tracking. In: Studia Universitatis Moldaviae (Seria Ştiinţe ale Educației), 2014, nr. 9(79), pp. 186-191. ISSN 1857-2103. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Studia Universitatis Moldaviae (Seria Ştiinţe ale Educației) | ||||||
Numărul 9(79) / 2014 / ISSN 1857-2103 /ISSNe 2345-1025 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 37.0(569.4) | ||||||
Pag. 186-191 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The grouping method was initiated in the United States in 1920 after World War I and the idea of separating the class pupils to several groupings has spread across the United States upon the implementation of intelligence tests. The grouping is determined according to the intelligence test: division of the children in a class into three levels: A, B and C. A low grouping brings about a negative effect upon the self-image of a pupil – a grouping by one method or another, can bring about an adverse effect upon the self-image of pupils, even by the mere fact of belonging to a low grouping. The contribution of the grouping method – the method allows for awarding equal opportunities to pupils by creating
homogenous classes of weak pupils, which allows for giving personal treatment to each pupil, as here two significant problems in classes are being resolved, which are: the number of pupils in a class, whereas in the grouping method, there would be smaller groups of pupils who receive a more personal and special treatment, as well as the problem of heterogeneity existing in a regular class.
Principally, the grouping method was supposed to bring about an inclusion of pupils in the school and reduce and fight instances of exclusion which basically signifies the absence of equality that brings about a low self-image in pupils. The contribution of the grouping method to achieving excellence by separation cannot be ignored, whereas separation supports the value of excelling and even can bring it about. Parallel to excelling, the term of equality that many strive at, has been severely damaged and school principals face the difficult dilemma of excelling versus equality. The value of excelling is an elevated and important one, indeed its price is high and basically it is harmful to the principle of equality and especially in low groupings , which to my estimation is not appropriate and therefore there is a need to search for methods of achieving excellence without adversely affecting the self-image in weak groupings. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie tracking, grouping, academization, tracking policy, nurturing policy, Administrative Progressive, vocational policy. |
||||||
|