Formează oare articolul o clasă de cuvinte (o „parte de vorbire”?)
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
922 5
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2023-02-27 16:50
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
811.135.1'1'36 (1)
Limbi romanice balcanice (Limba română) (1456)
SM ISO690:2012
GABINSCHI, Marc. Formează oare articolul o clasă de cuvinte (o „parte de vorbire”?) In: Philologia, 2015, nr. 1-2(277-278), pp. 60-79. ISSN 1857-4300.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Philologia
Numărul 1-2(277-278) / 2015 / ISSN 1857-4300 /ISSNe 2587-3717

Formează oare articolul o clasă de cuvinte (o „parte de vorbire”?)
CZU: 811.135.1'1'36

Pag. 60-79

Gabinschi Marc
 
Institutul de Filologie al AŞM
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 13 august 2015


Rezumat

The author’s argumentation, expounded mostly as a series of objections to C. Dimitriu and in support of other Romanian linguists, is aimed at showing the article (unlike prepositions, conjunctions etc.) having the necessary traits of a categorial marker of a word form of which it is eo ipso a part, hence not being a word itself. Sometimes this is evident (as in case of the adjacent Balkan, Scandinavian, Basque and other post-position or of the Hebrew pre-position), sometimes, however, it is a part of a non-evident split word form, cf. the English split infinitive, a subclass of German verbs etc. (as in West Germanic and West Romance), but always nothing more than a categorial marker. Finally, C. Dimitriu’s denying the existence of the category of definiteness in Romanian is also strongly criticized.

Cuvinte-cheie
word, Category, marker,

word form, adjacent, split.

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Gabinschi, M.A.</creatorName>
<affiliation>Institutul de Filologie al AŞM, Moldova, Republica</affiliation>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title xml:lang='ro'>Formează oare articolul o clasă de cuvinte (o „parte de vorbire”?)</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher>
<publicationYear>2015</publicationYear>
<relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISSN' relationType='IsPartOf'>1857-4300</relatedIdentifier>
<subjects>
<subject>word</subject>
<subject>word form</subject>
<subject>Category</subject>
<subject>marker</subject>
<subject>adjacent</subject>
<subject>split.</subject>
<subject schemeURI='http://udcdata.info/' subjectScheme='UDC'>811.135.1'1'36</subject>
</subjects>
<dates>
<date dateType='Issued'>2015-04-01</date>
</dates>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Journal article</resourceType>
<descriptions>
<description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'>The author’s argumentation, expounded mostly as a series of objections to C. Dimitriu and in support of other Romanian linguists, is aimed at showing the article (unlike prepositions, conjunctions etc.) having the necessary traits of a categorial marker of a word form of which it is eo ipso a part, hence not being a word itself. Sometimes this is evident (as in case of the adjacent Balkan, Scandinavian, Basque and other post-position or of the Hebrew
pre-position), sometimes, however, it is a part of a non-evident split word form, cf. the English split infinitive, a subclass of German verbs etc. (as in West Germanic and West Romance), but
always nothing more than a categorial marker. Finally, C. Dimitriu’s denying the existence of the category of definiteness in Romanian
is also strongly criticized.</description>
</descriptions>
<formats>
<format>application/pdf</format>
</formats>
</resource>