Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
640 2 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-04-13 21:35 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
338.48(478+498)(091) (1) |
Turism (532) |
SM ISO690:2012 NEGRU, Elena. Schimburile de turiști dintre RSS Moldovenească și Republica Socialistă România (anii 60 -70 ai sec. XX). In: Revista de Istorie a Moldovei, 2013, nr. 2(94), pp. 83-90. ISSN 1857-2022. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Revista de Istorie a Moldovei | |||||
Numărul 2(94) / 2013 / ISSN 1857-2022 | |||||
|
|||||
CZU: 338.48(478+498)(091) | |||||
Pag. 83-90 | |||||
|
|||||
Descarcă PDF | |||||
Rezumat | |||||
This study is dedicated to the exchange of tourists between the Moldovan Soviet Socialist Republic (MSSR) and the Romanian Socialist Republic (RSR) in the context of the propagandistic war of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) and Moldovan Communist Party (MCP) against Romania, unleashed in the second half of
1960s. The author shows that after nearly two post-war decades of quasi-full isolation of the MSSR residents from those of Romania, except for the ‘thaw’ that took place during Hrusciov’s times, when sporadic exchanges of tourists and delegations took place, from 1965 on we witness an activation of human contacts between the MSSR
and the RSR. The number of tourists from RSR increased from 988 persons in 1966 to 26,612 in 1976. In 1974, Romania ranked first by the number of tourists arrived from the MSSR, thus leaving Bulgaria behind. Such an evolution was in agreement with the USSR policy of that time of extending its relations with foreign countries, especially the communist ones. The soviet leaders not only pursued foreign exchange gains but first of all combating the ‘special course’ of Romania, the interpretations of Romanian historians of the history of Bessarabia and MSSR, and of the Russian- and Soviet-Romanian relations. Therefore, the Central Committee of the MCP and the Committee of Ministers of the MSSR, in their decisions of 1960s-70s insisted on the political and historical training of guides for Romanian tourists, on the one hand, and on preparing
special agendas for tourists from Romania, on the other hand. |
|||||
|