Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
853 29 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-10-30 08:36 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
821.135.1.09 (622) |
Literatură romanică balcanică (Literatură română) (2087) |
SM ISO690:2012 MIRONESCU, Doris. George Călinescu şi proiectul monografic Eminescu. In: Metaliteratură, 2015, nr. 1(39), pp. 71-75. ISSN 1857-1905. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Metaliteratură | ||||||
Numărul 1(39) / 2015 / ISSN 1857-1905 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 821.135.1.09 | ||||||
Pag. 71-75 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
This paper discusses G. Călinescu’s work in the field of Eminescu studies in the 1930s. Even though the author himself underplays the importance of this work, describing it as a mere preparation for greater endeavours (e.g. writing his celebrated History of Romanian Literature from Its Beginnings until Today, 1941), one should
visualise this activity as a complex „monograph project” concerning Eminescu from a threefold perspective: a biography, an ample exegesis, and a noteworthy editorial enterprise. The posterity of this project in the field of Eminescu studies in Romania and abroad has been remarkable, and Călinescu’s suggestions still hold, but a change has taken place recently. Biography has taken a turn for methodological reflection with Ilina Gregory, thus returning to a point of view that had been formulated by Călinescu in 1932. Also, the exegesis has become more concerned with questions of
reception and context, echoing Călinescu’s own emphasis on how a reader approaches Eminescu’s texts in his studies from 1934-1936. At the same time, Călinescu’s discovery of the posthumous works of Eminescu has influenced not only critics, but generations of poets, especially in the 1950s. All these points to a prominent position
of Călinescu’s critical stance in Romanian literature even today. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie G. Călinescu’s project on Eminescu’s work, the method of the monograph, biography and narration, exegesis and reader-response, text vs. context, the influence of Eminescu’s poetry in the 1950s, G. Călinescu’s position in the Romanian literary canon. |
||||||
|
DataCite XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Mironescu, D.</creatorName> <affiliation>Universitatea "Alexandru Ioan Cuza", Iaşi, România</affiliation> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title xml:lang='ro'>George Călinescu şi proiectul monografic Eminescu</title> </titles> <publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher> <publicationYear>2015</publicationYear> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISSN' relationType='IsPartOf'>1857-1905</relatedIdentifier> <subjects> <subject>G. Călinescu’s project on Eminescu’s work</subject> <subject>the method of the monograph</subject> <subject>biography and narration</subject> <subject>exegesis and reader-response</subject> <subject>text vs. context</subject> <subject>the influence of Eminescu’s poetry in the 1950s</subject> <subject>G. Călinescu’s position in the Romanian literary canon.</subject> <subject schemeURI='http://udcdata.info/' subjectScheme='UDC'>821.135.1.09</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType='Issued'>2015-04-01</date> </dates> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Journal article</resourceType> <descriptions> <description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'>This paper discusses G. Călinescu’s work in the field of Eminescu studies in the 1930s. Even though the author himself underplays the importance of this work, describing it as a mere preparation for greater endeavours (e.g. writing his celebrated History of Romanian Literature from Its Beginnings until Today, 1941), one should visualise this activity as a complex „monograph project” concerning Eminescu from a threefold perspective: a biography, an ample exegesis, and a noteworthy editorial enterprise. The posterity of this project in the field of Eminescu studies in Romania and abroad has been remarkable, and Călinescu’s suggestions still hold, but a change has taken place recently. Biography has taken a turn for methodological reflection with Ilina Gregory, thus returning to a point of view that had been formulated by Călinescu in 1932. Also, the exegesis has become more concerned with questions of reception and context, echoing Călinescu’s own emphasis on how a reader approaches Eminescu’s texts in his studies from 1934-1936. At the same time, Călinescu’s discovery of the posthumous works of Eminescu has influenced not only critics, but generations of poets, especially in the 1950s. All these points to a prominent position of Călinescu’s critical stance in Romanian literature even today.</description> </descriptions> <formats> <format>application/pdf</format> </formats> </resource>