| Conţinutul numărului revistei |
| Articolul precedent |
| Articolul urmator |
 |
 1205 4 |
| Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2017-04-28 16:06 |
| Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
| 004.8:519.756.2:577.212 (2) |
| Inteligență artificială (303) |
| Cibernetică matematică (93) |
| Bazele materiale ale vieții. Biochimie. Biologie moleculară. Biofizică (664) |
 SM ISO690:2012LANGILLE, Miika, PETRESCU, Ion, ROGOJIN, Vladimir. Three models for gene assembly in ciliates: a
comparison. In: Computer Science Journal of Moldova, 2010, nr. 1(52), pp. 15-40. ISSN 1561-4042. |
| EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
 Computer Science Journal of Moldova |
||||||
| Numărul 1(52) / 2010 / ISSN 1561-4042 /ISSNe 2587-4330 | ||||||
|
||||||
| CZU: 004.8:519.756.2:577.212 | ||||||
| Pag. 15-40 | ||||||
|
||||||
 Descarcă PDF |
||||||
| Rezumat | ||||||
We survey in this paper the main differences among three
variants of an intramolecular model for gene assembly: the general, the simple, and the elementary models. We present all of
them in terms of sorting signed permutations and compare their
behavior with respect to: (i) completeness, (ii) confluence (with
the notion defined in three different setups), (iii) decidability, (iv)
characterization of the sortable permutations in each model, (v)
sequential complexity, and (vi) experimental validation. |
||||||
| Cuvinte-cheie Ciliate, simple gene assembly, simple model, elementary model, confluence |
||||||
|
Dublin Core Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:oai_dc='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd'> <dc:creator>Langille, M.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Petrescu, I.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Rogojin, V.I.</dc:creator> <dc:date>2010-01-05</dc:date> <dc:description xml:lang='en'>We survey in this paper the main differences among three variants of an intramolecular model for gene assembly: the general, the simple, and the elementary models. We present all of them in terms of sorting signed permutations and compare their behavior with respect to: (i) completeness, (ii) confluence (with the notion defined in three different setups), (iii) decidability, (iv) characterization of the sortable permutations in each model, (v) sequential complexity, and (vi) experimental validation.</dc:description> <dc:source>Computer Science Journal of Moldova 52 (1) 15-40</dc:source> <dc:subject>Ciliate</dc:subject> <dc:subject>simple gene assembly</dc:subject> <dc:subject>simple model</dc:subject> <dc:subject>elementary model</dc:subject> <dc:subject>confluence</dc:subject> <dc:title>Three models for gene assembly in ciliates: a comparison</dc:title> <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type> </oai_dc:dc>
|
|
|
