In this article, the author analyses the parties’ liability when terminating a contract for touristic services provision. The article provides an analysis of the termination procedures of the agreement in Moldova in contrast with the same procedure in Romania, focusing on the similarities and differences between the legal regulations in these two countries. Particular attention is paid to the tourist’s rights, especially to the provisions regarding the amicable settlement of the disputes. The author emphasises the fact that the Romanian legislation expressly stipulates the legal steps that the tourist must take in order to protect his/her violated rights, while in Moldova this preliminary procedure is ignored in the specialized regulations, whilst being a compulsory stage in order for a tourist to take his matter into court. The author alsfo expresses her own opinion regarding the transposition of the legal stipulation in Moldova regarding the liability of the parties of the contract of touristic services provision, especially regarding the fact why there is not practically any case law in this domain.